Illuminati vs. Jesus [a debate about evolution]

How else do fossils form? Oh yeah, a FLOOD. Thanks again!

What’s wrong with 6 million years? Does that seem too long to you?

Of course evolution relies on sheer chance. That’s how it works.

If theres no reason to insult me, theres no reason to ban. Its simple logic. Use logic.

How do you prove the 6 million years in the first place? This is the whole question.

DNA is so complex, the fact that it was randomly created doesnt even have a value. And thats your proof!

I was referring to your promise to come back if you get banned. It goes without saying that’s against the rules. If you want cites for your other behavior, you broke the rule against calling people liars earlier:

I moderated you for that one but didn’t give you a formal warning.

And you’re now tiptoeing up to our rules on personal insults:

Your disingenuousness about the ‘apes in my ancestry’ comment aside, you’re now coming pretty close to insulting other posters and you need to stop. Going on the attack in advance by daring people to ban you will not work.

Then prove DNA is too complex to have randomly evolved. Hint: it has to do with billions of years and millions of chemical reactions every second.

Watch one of the chuck missler videos i POSTED ON THIS THREAD.

Evolution isn’t random; DNA and other products of evolution are the result of natural selection applied to billions upon billions of genetic mixings and mutations. It’s mindless and directionless, yes; there’s no master plan and no one is telling it where to go; but it isn’t random.

Hint: the burden of proof is on you to keep your theories as ‘FACTS’ in text books. Getting this yet? You should state facts, not answer questions. Explain symbiosis over millions of years. Thanks.

Selection isnt creation. Do you have access to a dictionary? Or are you going to start talking about lizard people again?

Why should I be banned? Did I use improper language or insult people? Or was that all against me?

What’s to explain? Your “they had to come simultaneously” argument is uncited and incorrect. It was already rebutted.

Dawkins covers this elegantly in “Climbing Mount Improbable.”

Henry Morris makes the same error you do, in insisting that DNA arrive all in one step, without any intermediate steps. He calculates the total number of possible DNA strings, then, without the least justification, divides “1” by this number, and claims that as the “probability” of DNA arising.

(There are 7 billion people on earth; thus, the probability, per Morris, of my existence is one in 7,000,000,000. Pretty slim odds. Miraculous! So much for Morris.)

I said nothing about banning you until you brought up the possibility that you were going to get banned. I said boasting about what you’re going to do if you get banned isn’t a good idea.

Where was it rebutted? Surely you saw the link?

What makes him an authority to be listened to?

Organic compounds (including amino acids)created in lab.
And to save you the trouble.

Nor did I say it was. DNA wasn’t “created”; it evolved from simple to highly complex over billions of years.

I dint talk about my banning until it was told to me. Cause and effect. Getting banned doesnt really help me post here. And I want to post here, because I think there are a lot of intelligent people here. However, I think they went to the same public schools that I did. Thats all.

Cite please?