Ah Miller/Urey. They filtered the experiment, removed any oxygen, and only came up with 2 out of 22 amino acids. And they lacked any chirality. They failed. Notice how almost nobody has tried since.
You didn’t read that at all. They made more than twenty amino acids. Frankly, making one amino acid would prove the process.
Trinopus:
Dawkins covers this elegantly in “Climbing Mount Improbable.”
Henry Morris makes the same error you do, in insisting that DNA arrive all in one step, without any intermediate steps. He calculates the total number of possible DNA strings, then, without the least justification, divides “1” by this number, and claims that as the “probability” of DNA arising.
(There are 7 billion people on earth; thus, the probability, per Morris, of my existence is one in 7,000,000,000. Pretty slim odds. Miraculous! So much for Morris.)
If you cite dawkins, I cite HOVIND. DNA is strill unexplainable to you. You know sexual reproduction is the only method for passsing genes to offspring, right?
Cite that!!! Please. And they need to have chirality.
Nobody said anything about banning you. The post about insults that you quoted was a warning to someone else not to insult you . I am not sure what caused you to start blustering about the mods insulting and possibly banning you –
But since the mods didn’t insult you and we weren’t talking about banning you, I suggest you just stop.
That should come as surprising news to all those plant and animal species that reproduce asexually.
Marley23:
Nobody said anything about banning you. The post about insults that you quoted was a warning to someone else not to insult you . I am not sure what caused you to start blustering about the mods insulting and possibly banning you –
But since the mods didn’t insult you and we weren’t talking about banning you, I suggest you just stop.
If thats the case then i apologize. I dont want to be banned. It doesnt help me at all.
reef_shark:
Where was it rebutted?
You quoted a post from iiandyiiii that dealt with this issue already. As a bit of friendly advice I’ll tell you you’d be better off just posting cites. You’ll have a hard time getting people to sit there and watch a YouTube video.
Which animals reproduce asexually???
Sitnam
July 15, 2012, 5:29am
531
Cite the word ‘cite’ please, thank you.
God bless.
I know. 1 hour youtube videos usually get closed right away. But theres info there, im doing what I can. I cant explain it better than missler.
Are you comparing a bacteria to a human?
Asexual reproduction is found in nearly half of the animal phyla. Parthenogenesis occurs in the hammerhead shark and the blacktip shark. In both cases, the sharks had reached sexual maturity in captivity in the absence of males, and in both cases the offspring were shown to be genetically identical to the mothers. The New Mexico whiptail is another example.
Some reptiles use the ZW sex-determination system, which produces either males (with ZZ sex chromosomes) or females (with ZW or WW sex chrom...
Took me less than a minute to google that.
Check the sources in the Wiki article.
Explain why chirality has anything to do with it.
Who was that other person though?? That was insulting me, that the mod was talking about?
Yeast are not bacteria. And yes, I do compare some humans to bacteria.
You do know you could go back and look, right?
LOL I know about the reef shark.
Reproduction occurs only once a year for hammerhead sharks, and usually occurs with the male shark biting the female shark violently until she agrees to mate with him. The hammerhead sharks exhibit a viviparous mode of reproduction with females giving birth to live young. Like other sharks, fertilization is internal, with the male transferring sperm to the female through one of two intromittent organs called claspers. The developing embryos are at first sustained by a yolk sac. When the suppl In ...
