We’re “human capital” here. That’s not exactly an improvement.
This is getting out of control. We better schedule a come-to-Jesus meeting.
The first time I heard that phrase I thought it meant “Meet Jesus - now!” Um, so Bob was late with the report, why do you want to kill him? But I’m Christianity Impaired.
Let’s strategize our through-put paradigm shift using a holistic, team-based simulation so we can actualize a synergistic virtual/brick-and-mortar interface that will enable next-generation functionalities for mission-critical end users on a 24/7 cross-platform.
Stick a fork in me, I’m done.
The leadership has too much on their plates to attend the round table. Lets give others on the team the opportunity for visibility.
If you are all full-time employees then I agree that calling you all FTEs is not only pointless, but takes longer to say than “people.”
But this one does have a useful meaning when analyzing staffing levels. Two part-timers equals one full-time equivalent. So if you have 10 full-time and 10 part-time you have 15 FTEs. A similar one is PMEs, paid man equivalents. 40 hours of overtime in a week is one paid-man equivalent. So, for example, if you have 10 employees consistently working hours equal to 12 PMEs, it would be cheaper to just hire 2 more people and reduce overtime.
Now, back to your regularly-scheduled holistic deep dive…
Good, because failure is not an option. Oops, my bad.
When are you going to have the bandwidth to spend a few cycles on this? We need to be requirements complete before we can move forward. Do you have an ETA for when you will define the deliverables and get the users on board? Please advise.
Whoa, this thread is like herding cats. Which I’ve heard four times in the last 24 hours.
Yo, people. Herding cats was colorful and original in 1992. Today it’s as fresh as an uncleaned litter box.
Going forward, the HR department has been re-branded as “Talent Management.” *
*I wish I was kidding.