That’s kind of you to say and I do appreciate it.
They’re not anonymous. You know exactly who sent every response and chose to publish them without their consent.
I do believe that you meant no harm, but it was a colossally assholish thing to do. I hope you learned something the last couple of days.
I hope the people so outraged learned something too. From what I’ve seen, Idle Thought’s doesn’t have a mean spirited bone in his body. If after all this any of you think this was intended to be a frat boy on nerd pantsing with him chortling about what a fool he made of everyone, then you missed a learning opportunity as well.
No luck with that Santa Clause thing either, huh?
You have it exactly backwards. I said I thought it was unintentional. It’s not frat boy on nerd, it’s nerd cluelessness. You mistake cruelty for humor. It’s why nerds are called nerds. They don’t get normal human interaction. It’s just as bad as dickbag jocks.
The Tim Allen movie?
No idea what you mean here.
It’s not nerd cluelessness. The dividing line on feelings here does not seem remotely divided that way.
And I stand by what I said, if you think this was done out of casual cruelty, you missed a lesson.
Accidental cruelty. It’s a nerd disease.
Whatever. You go be righteous.
Aren’t you the founder of one of those sites that exist for the sole purpose of talking shit about the posters here? Apologies if I’m wrong.
But if not - yeah, I’ll take my personal conduct advice from you…
No need to warn me, Mods, I’m done with this sidetrack.
I used to think I was sort of thin-skinned, but after reading this thread I realize I am an alligator wrapped in turtle shells.
So are your accusations against Idle Thoughts.
I get the impression you were deeply offended. I didn’t think it was amusing, either, but I didn’t rake Idle Thoughts over the coals for it. It wasn’t jerkish or malicious, just a joke that fell a little flat.
Yes. Ten frigging years ago I made a trainwreck archive that was actually done in a good spirited way.
For all to judge: http://cloudhelmut.4t.com/snarkarchive.html
Your enlightened grudge holding is duly noted.
I can’t help that you are wrong and have concocted some sort of extreme melodrama in your head. This is a trivial topic that I care very little about.
I haven’t raked anyone over the coals, nor am I deeply offended.
Someone can comment that something is offensive without being personally offended by it and actions can be jerkish without being malicious. When the jerkiness of a non-malicious act is pointed out to the perpetrator, they often choose not to repeat the action, thus reducing future jerky behavior and making the world better. Now you’ve made the world a bit worse to balance it out. Bravo!
No, Anaman, your comments really stood out as trying hard to be hurtful. It was really obvious. Sorry.
I’ve made the world a bit worse? Bravo? Really?
C’mon, who’s being melodramatic? :rolleyes:
I agree completely.
It would have been way more funny to send PMs claiming “you are banned for a week”. Now that would have been a prank.
Then when people realized they could still post, and started freaking out, we could all laugh at how they were fooled.
So things are only funny if you find them funny? Well, maybe you should make a list for the rest of us so we will stop laughing at the things you have decreed to be unfunny.
When the truth hurts, pointing it out does not take much effort.
What’s obvious is that you are basing your opinion on the topic on your personal feelings toward Idle Thoughts and the belief that since Idle Thoughts is nice, anything he does is automatically viewed in this light and anyone who says otherwise is a big meanie. I however, had never noticed the existence of Idle Thoughts beyond the fact that the name was familiar. No doubt I have read many postings by Idle Thoughts, but none stood out enough to distinguish him. I suppose I could look some up now and perhaps I would learn that his other postings reveal him to be an amazing and wonderful human being, but what difference would it make?
My opinion of this behavior and its perpetrator are based only on this situation, whereas yours is based on a positive prejudice toward its perpetrator. There is nothing wrong with that obviously, but we are coming from two different places. If this prank had been pulled by a poster I already had positive feelings about, I’m sure that would color my opinion as well.