I'm sorry, how is this worth a warning?

[descamisado]

[quote=“Gary “Wombat” Robson, post:2, topic:532155”]

[moderating]
lissener, would you please use descriptive titles (I changed this one from “WANT” to “WANT: Shining Clock”), and describe what your link is. There are a lot of people who won’t click on blind links like this.
[/moderating]
[/QUOTE]

@lissener

No, I probably won’t. The purpose of the title was to impart a bit of a surprise package feeling to the thread. If you can fit the entire OP into the title, what’s the friggin point?

And if some people won’t click on blind links, so what? Participation is not mandatory. I thought the rule was no NSFW links? If I post a link that’s inappropriate, then ding me. But moderating because some people might THINK it’s inappropriate is ridiculous.

So no, I probably won’t use descriptive titles in this kind of thread, so until the rule is clearer–seriously? we’re not allowed to post perfectly safe links that some random person might incorrectly think is NSFW? seriously?–then I won’t post this kind of thread at all.

Surely the threshold for moderator intervention should be higher than this.

Lissener, are you sincerely saying that, in response to GWR’s note (quoted above in its entirety), that your first sentence in response (quoted above in its entirety) you are stating you probably won’t follow one or both of GWR’s instructions (although you do go on to elaborate on the title portion)? Where in his initial note does GWR say anything like “or don’t post at all”?