There are two guys in my lab who I like and respect, but sometimes I come very close to wanting to smack them down.
A conversation never goes by without either of them questioning what I say. Not only do they question what I say, but they insist that I’m wrong.
Case in point: One day we start talking about neck rings and I mention the Masai people. Both guys turn to me and tell me that I’m wrong: the Masai don’t wear neck rings. I’m thinking, they tell me, of the Burmese. No, I say. I’m 100% sure that the Massai wear neck rings too. No, they both insist. I’m not right. The Masai DO NOT wear neckrings.
This goes back and forth before my advisor chimes in and says I’m right. And then they shut up.
Another example: We talk about birthdays and I tell everyone my father’s birthday is Jan. 6, the day celebrated by many as Three Kings Day. One of the Arrogant Boys says he’s never heard of this day, and I ask if he’s every heard of the Epiphany. He says the Epiphany is another day. No, I say. I’m pretty sure it’s Jan. 6. No, he says. And because I know how this guy works, I admit that he may be right so that we can drop it. But as soon as I get home, I look it up. I was right. Jerkoff was wrong. Once again.
Yet another instance: I work with meiofauna (very small animals). In fact, I’m probably the expert on meiofauna within a five mile radius of my school. One of the Arrogant Boys (same one as above) is just starting a project on sediment-dwelling meiofauna. I notice he’s using the compound scope instead of the stereoscope to go through the sediment. When I suggest that it would be 1000 times easier to use the stereoscope, he balks. No, he says. He needs the compound so he can see. Even when I explain how the stereoscope would be easier, he still doesn’t want to listen. Finally, frustrated, I practically demand that he use the stereoscope because I can’t bear to watch him waste time (as well as the scope’s light bulb). But I have to admit my bruised ego also came into play. I have four years of research to this guy’s one month–the least he could do is respect my suggestion by listening. And he eventually did…but I practically had to kill him in the process.
Today: The other Arrogant Fool routinely denounces Uncle Cecil’s words of wisdom as false. Today I shared with him the story of the electrocuted-pee-pee guy. He said that it was impossible. That it just can’t happen. Even in a singular freak accident. And then he launched into a lecture explaining why it couldn’t happen. A lecture, by the way, that I did not really want to hear.
I tuned out.
I don’t know. I have no problem with engaging people in intellectual discussion or debate. That’s why I like the GD board. Nor do I have a problem with people questioning stuff. However, I do have a problem with people who question EVERYTHING. I don’t want to share information with these people anymore because I don’t feel like debating them at every turn. Sometimes I just want people to accept what I say. Even if they don’t believe it, they could at least hide their contempt for my intelligence by pretending that they do.
I know no one can make you feel inferior unless you let them, but sometimes that’s how I feel when I’m around them. And I don’t know what to do about it.