You know that there is something wrong with a piece of jewelry when … your first reaction on seeing it is to attempt to remember what the plural of “scrotum” is (“scrotums”? “scrota”?).
Unless of course that is the reaction intended by the creator of said jewelry. 
Hmmm … you might be onto something there. Possibly the design is a way of saying, “Here, honey, here are some diamonds for you to hang around your neck. Now I get to tea-bag you.”
Try this, it’s the jewelry store chain that carries her designs.
Correction: now I and a friend get to tea-bag you. Simultaneously.
Because when the source of your fame is pretending to be someone else, you don’t feel like people like YOU. So you try to do something “meaningful” under your own name.
What she really needs is an alcoholic superhero to carve the design into the moon.
It’d totally work. I saw it in this documentary once…
Ugh.
Or you just post anonymously on a messageboard!!
Win–Win!!
ps. OP-- I wish I had a fraction of the money she’s making on this holiday promotion. So do you.
What is most amusing to me about that commercial is that she “worked with” Kay to come up with that. I mean, how much work could it have taken? And what was rejected along the way?
The idea might have been a fairly good one if the two hearts were upright and entwined or overlapping, but as it is it, it just looks silly. It’s hard to believe that professional jewelers okayed that thing.
Maybe they were just so eager to get Seymour behind it that they gave her carte blanche contractually and were obliged to go with whatever she came up with and their contribution was limited to trying to come up with suitable ways to embellish and/or dangle it.
Well you can buy the artwork. I mean if you don’t mind having a two minute sketch of T&A on your wall.
Let’s just be grateful she didn’t produce a children’s book…
I disagree. Axe’s statement is similar to most diamond ads: “Use/buy this and you will get laid!” This is less sweeping a statement than “producing a universal symbol of hope and love”.
Good to see I’m not the only one. The design is ugly and “universal symbol of hope and love”? Gag.
To be fair, I’m hoping the script I’m writing becomes the universal symbol of hope and love as well. Because if that happens, I’m fixing to make a shit-ton of money.
I’ve never really thought about it before, but essentially they’re saying, “Wanna get some ass? We got ya covered.”
That sums up 90% of all advertising in the history of the universe.
“Drink this beer/soda and watch bikini-clad hotties parachute into your yard! Drive this car and lingerie models will fight to occupy your passenger seat! Use this shampoo and shirtless firemen will walk in slow motion through your kitchen!”
The other 10% of advertising is summarized by “this product will make your kids shut up for a minute.”
Especially since Mr “K” died a few years back … I know, mrAru and I went to the memorial service they held for him at the spiffy chapel a thte sub base here in new london [he was a great supporter of the sub fleet, I hear he threw great parties for them down in Ft Lauderdale. mrAru said he was a pretty sweet guy.]
And we both think the necklace looks like tag team teabagging=)
Nothing says love like conjoined asses.
Yay! Another reason to never want diamonds.
Huh, the jewelry itself looks to me just like a gaudy, diamond encrusted flamingo. Sans the legs, of course. It’s really tacky…
Or, you know, a couple of butts. Whatevah! 
God damn that thing is ugly.