Nile TV is reporting over 50% BUT as I said it will be confirmed tomorrow night on TV by election committee.
Each voter gets to put his tick behind a screen. He was free to put his tick where he wanted. The recent terrorism made voters even more determined to vote for Sisi and get them out. I saw a few known MB neighbours voting when I voted.
No need for link to the ballot paper guy story above
MadaMasr is one of the best Anti Army blogger sites you can find. Sara Carr an Egyptian blogger who writes extensively for the MB and against the army and who boycotted the referendum is a regular reporter for them so sorry Mada Masr stories are rarely taken seriously by Egyptians. If you want balanced reporting there are very few in English. Maybe Lyse Doucet of BBC is the best.
Also the ballot boxes are transparent . I put my ballot in and it could easily be read. If he wrote on it then the judge beside the box can easily read it has more than a tick in the circle.
In fact many people took photos of their ballot paper and waved it before putting it in box. Some put it in box showing the tick to cameras as they were proud to tick yes.
When they do the tick they can do what they like tick Yes or Not in secret after that when it is in box it can be seen but by then it is in closed box and counted.
It is weird. Arab authoritarian leaders (and that is often the same in other areas of the world, too) during “elections” have a real dilemma. On one hand, if the results of the balloting are less than 90%, they look weak in their supporters’ eyes and in the eyes of other authoritarian neighbors. But if the results are 90% or more, no one in the free world takes those results seriously. What to do, what to do…
They usually go for the fellow-authoritarians’ “legitimacy” vs Western one. See Sisi’s 97% here (and I am sure when he runs in the upcoming elections, the results will be simlar). Or Bashar Assad in 2007 - re-elected with 97% of the vote. What is it about 97%? I guess 99% looks way too much, and 90% leaves too substantial an apparent opposition.
…which means people can be targeted for the way they vote, or even political statements they write on the ballot. This is a problem. Fair elections depend on each voter being able to vote their conscience, and that’s not possible when the vote isn’t secret and there’s an active climate of suppressing certain political views.
ETA: In this light, the high incidence of “Yes” votes is rather easily explained, as it was in the articles I’ve read: voting “No” means being subject to arrest and harassment, so people who would’ve voted “No” simply don’t vote. This cannot be called a mandate.
Egypt is an Arab speaking country. Our news is in Arabic. If Nile is saying 50% then they are probably accurate.
If you read my post further back I mention them I think.
No they are not reliable because as I said they are anti Coup so biased.
The only true source would be the people who live in Egypt and certainly not Western journalists who support the MB almost 100% with the exception of as i said Lyse Doucet who is very professional and just reports what she sees and not what she thinks.
If you have Twitter then you could check out these guys who write in English to see what is being said in the streets and the reality in Egypt .
I understand, but a link in Arabic does me no good, you see. Reports in English are giving lower numbers.
So, even when they are just relaying the state media’s own reports, the NYT is fabricating stories? This sort of approach, hand-waving away reports that contain information you don’t like, makes actual debate impossible.
First it is illegal and against vote rules to do anything but a tick as it invalidates the ballot paper. Obviously you can write a poem and draw smilies in your country, but we are talking about Egypt voting rules. I know nothing of anyone being arrested, their ballot is just rejected.
Second are you serious?? have you see the counts? we are not America, we do not have enough prisons to put all the NO voters in ! OMG!!
I saw my own neighbours who are MB go in and vote and come out again get in their cars and drive away. No one even looked twice at them. I was glad they voted. That’s democracy.
Well, I’ve given you a report that someone was arrested. Cite that marking on the ballot in this way is a crime, as opposed to merely disqualifying the ballot?
You don’t have to. No regime ever does. I doubt Stalinist Russia had the gulag capacity for everyone who wanted to complain about the government. But who will be the first to do so, knowing that they may not have room in prison for everyone, they might have room for you? And then there’s all the options for extra-judical intimidation and violence…
Democracy requires secret ballots.
So, how do you explain the 97% figure? MB supporters spontaneously switching allegiance, or MB supporters boycotting the election?
And you are blinded by your personal bias and vested interest. That comment was just as constructive to discussion as yours, i.e. not at all.