Is civil war in Egypt averted? 90% yes for new Constitution.

[quote=“NotfooledbyW, post:993, topic:679071”]

. So is there a reason to trump up charges like this after the fact?

I was responding to your reply that trumped up charges were the, “surest way to keep him from going around demanding back the presidency”. Celebrations of the coup after the fact do not justify the coup. My point is that the military was so popular following the coup and they could hold Morsi without arresting him. Does that not allow one to wonder why the military would need to ‘trump up’ charges which in itself could incite further violence? They could simply detain Morsi until such time that things calmed down. I think that is a valid question.

Again I am not saying the military has not trumped up theses charged. I am asking why they would think they need to.

Imprisoning your political opponents is as old as civilization. Your argument seems to be that the coup was so needed and so popular that Morsi is already neutralized as an opponent so why bothering framing him? Bizarrely ignoring that there is a shitload of people, eg the Muslim Brotherhood, who don’t see it that way.

Not to mention the show that they may feel needs to be put on for the outside world. Even Stalin staged “trials”, before he executed his political enemies.

Well not just the outside world. Vilifying Morsi is useful domestically for all those Egyptians who merely thought he was incompetent. But no look! He’s a traitor too!

Point was they had the ability to imprison Morsi with and without trumping up a charge of giving defense secrets to the Republican Guard in Iran.

And what would make you think that I am ignoring the Muslim Brotherhood’s certain vehement dissagreement with millions of Egyptians who support the coup and celebrate it? Morsi himself tainted the MB organization as not suited to govern a free and tolerant society. I’m still wondering why trump up charges that may discredit the takeover if competent evidence cannot be produced.

You have not actually made that point. What would he have been imprisoned for?

That’s a good point. Tying the MB to a traitor they support could define the organization as never welcome in a democratic Egypt. However the record of incompetence and excess of Islamist-driven policy decisions is not in dispute. It seems there might be some risk by pushing trumped up charges that many might recognize what they are.

Well the obvious incompetence is in dispute to some degree in this very thread. Sometimes a leader can’t just fix the damn economy in less than a year and people disputed just how he could have handled the violence any differently.

As I wrote (see above) … Until things calmed down.

Yes they could. They could also drag him out to the street and shoot him in the head. It’s all about what optics they want.

On his way in Morsi appeared to realize the source of power that put him in a very exalted position in history … on his way out he should have remembered his own words and respected the people who entrusted him to that position of power. Morsi failed the “people” and they took back the power they granted him as he told them they should do one year before.

Morsi’s incompetence has been defined in many ways:
From the same link:

I expect you are right that if one rigid segment of Egyptian society was fully impressed with Morsi’s bulldozer approach to crushing and demolishing the revolutionaries’ democratic ideals then they would argue that Morsi was competant.

Being a fully competant bulldozer operator just does not cut it for me. And apparently it didnt cut it for ‘the people’ that ended Mubarak’s non-democratic method of governing too.

Face it, Morsi didnt endeavor to construct a democratic institution in Egypt. He was elected in part by a slim margin because many revolutionaries perceived he was better than the opponent who was tied to the military and Mubarak.

Morsi did not serve those who likely carried him into office. Failure to recognize the need and wisdom to do that so early in the democratic process was hugely incompetent as I believe most can see it,

The people who put him in power are not the people who removed him from power. Your own cite says that the military is the final arbiter of power in Egypt.

Regards,
Shodan

Yes, they (the military) sided in the end with the revolutionaries and moderately religious middle class and business people. They saw the power of the people in the streets were opposed to religious fanatics and the undemocratic actions President Morsi’s - so they acted to the power of the people.

Do you disagree with that rather universally accepted observation? It is absolutely consistent with saying the military was the final arbitrator of power in Egypt. And they are. They could have sided with Morsi and tried to crush the revolutionaries and their second revolt in two years.

Hey guys, it looks like we were wrong to doubt the benevolent intentions of the Egyptian military.

According to this CNN story, they are reporting they have cured AIDS and Hepatitis C.

Of course, there will always be foolish doubters:

So, praise them. Not only are they furthering democracy, they are making medical breakthroughs.

(unless the story is hoax to discredit the military, bastard anti-democracy fringe)

Why does Obama refuse to declare the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organisation??

http://www.justice.gov/usao/txn/PressRel08/HLF_convict_pr.html

The real story before the enhancement by the media was that the army scientists detected a LOW COST screening technique, not a cure.

[QUOE]In early 2012, Muslim Brotherhood presidential candidate Mohammed Morsi pranced around Egypt proclaiming “Jihad is our path,” and thought there was nothing better than to die in the cause of Allah—that is, the exact language used by terrorists!

Despite this, Barack Obama gushed on national television after Morsi was elected President of Egypt. And oddly—or not so oddly—Obama continued to gush over Morsi while reports surfaced that the Muslim Brotherhood were setting up torture chambers for their political enemies, not to mention openly crucifying Christians!

When Morsi was deposed, the Egyptian military discovered a treasure trove of documents linking the Obama regime with the illegal activities of the Muslim Brotherhood.

One such document is a list of Muslim Brotherhood officials receiving secret bribes in U.S. currency, paid out by the U.S. consulate, amounting to millions of dollars.

Investigative journalist Jerome Corsi has obtained a copy of the document held by the Egyptian military, proving the Obama regime sent millions of dollars in bribes to the Muslim Brotherhood.

But who was managing all of this money? Did the Muslim Brotherhood walk around with hundreds of thousands of dollars in their pockets?

Enter Malik Obama, Obama’s half brother. According to Egyptian television, citing the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt:

The President’s brother…is one of the architects of the major investments of the Muslim Brotherhood.

We’re not just talking about the bribes the Muslim Brotherhood received in Egypt, but the entire Muslim Brotherhood finances—worldwide—that more than likely included an astounding $8 billion dollar bribe to the Muslim Brotherhood made by the Obama regime. The bribe was payment to guarantee that the huge tract of Egyptian land, the Sinai Peninsula, be turned over to the Muslim Brotherhood sister group Hamas, undoubtably to put Israel in an indefensible position. The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas mince no words about their goals for Israel: total annihilation.

According to Egypt Daily News, a document exists showing the eight billion dollar “holocaust” agreement with the Obama administration that was signed by former Muslim Brotherhood President Mohammed Morsi and his second in command Khairat Al-Shater, both under arrest by the Egyptian military for murder and treason.

Does this document really exist, showing the $8 billion dollar bribe signed by Obama or one of his representatives?

Undoubtably.
[/QUOTE]

They’ve got it all wrong: the Sinai was to be turned over to the lizard people.

Even if that were true (and it doesn’t appear to be) it is bogus on its face. Not a ringing endorsement for the regime.