As opposed to flour, discarded cellular debris intended for wheat embryos that someone decided to pulverise and extract from the smashed shell of a mutant weed.
That sounds so much better doesn’t it?
Since so many people voluntarily drink milk I think you’re going to have to accept that milk doesn’t taste putrid, and the prominence of froth in milk advertising proves that it is attractive to most consumers, not icky.
Where did you get the ridiculous idea that anyone but you finds milk icky or putrid?
All foods have an unpleasant tendency to go bad. The difference is that while bad milk is highly unlikely to make you ill, many other foods will. In that respect milk has a more pleasant tendencies when going bad.
No. If you looked in the dictionary you could have answered that question yourself. Bad in the sense you think you are using it means “spoiled”. Milk can’t be already spoiled before it goes bad.
So you wouldn’t drink beer, that came out of a grain, or wine that came out of a grape, or juice that came out of an orange on the grounds that the are disgusting.
You must have a very bland diet. I’m glad I don’t suffer form your neuroses.
Based on milk consumption in pre-industrial times and consumption in developing nation it seems that 99% of people would drink milk if they actually had to squeeze it out themselves.
No. But then I wouldn’t eat pulverised human either. The way in which we treat produce varies from species to species.
I don’t know, how is it? Most people have drunk human milk. Mares milk has been a staple part of the diet in some parts of the world for over 5000 years. Dog milk is not a viable food source because dogs can’t eat grass. If it were then I would happily drink dog’s milk if I liked the taste.
I can’t see any reason why cow’s milk is any less revolting than those things.
So CarrotsNmySOX are you going to tell us what your comment is on Cecil’s comment. So far all I’ve seen is a semi-literate rant. What is your comment on the article? Did you enjoy it? Find it informative and factual?