I work at a property management company. I also have a background in architecture. I have used the term ‘master bedroom’ thousands of times in my work. So I was surprised yesterday when an associate told me the term was racist.
I checked around on the internet and some say, yes, and some say no. I certainly understand that in this political climate that there is a need to be sensitive, and I certainly am, but it should only extend to words with an actual connection, right?
And maybe this word does - I honestly don’t know. A New York Times article states:
I’d put it in the same group as “niggling” … it doesn’t matter what the historical roots or meaning are. It “has the sound of” enough that basic manners would currently guide one to avoid its use. “Primary bedroom” suffices.
Are young boys no longer allowed to be called master? Is a dog’s owner no longer his master? Are Master locks offensive? Am I no longer allowed to master a skill?
My point is that it’s not the word per se that is offensive; it is (or would be) what the word represents.
I don’t think my largest bedroom ever owned any slaves.
“Primary” means first; not biggest or best. Neither does a master bedroom control lesser bedrooms. The adjective clearly describes the occupant; the master(s) of the house. That’s where it gets problematic. Why not just call it the big bedroom?
Not just POC; what fraction of potential home buyers, a demographic that often skews to maybe late twenties to early forties and increasingly multicultural, find the phrase at least potentially off-putting? Bemoan the demographic as “woke” if you must, but they are sometimes sensitive to these things.
What fraction of those potential buyers are you as the realtor willing to put off, when “primary” and “main” serve as well?
Word usage change doesn’t have to make sense or have consistency in other usages.
I think it’s a pretty minor thing for me, personally, to start saying “primary” or “main” or “largest” bedroom rather than “master” bedroom, especially if it IS a big deal to other people. If it makes others more comfortable I’m all for this particular change.
Any racist association with the term is not based on actual usage. Anyone disturbed by it’s usage is irrational and unreasonable. I don’t see any more reason to humor people like that than election deniers. So I would like to know how many people who can afford to buy a house believe this nonsense. It will give me an idea how often I might run across one.