Men’s Rights Activist. Sorry, I thought it was a common term. Maybe it’s because I’ve been reading a lot of feminist blogs lately.
What I was saying is that some Men’s Rights Activists conclude that since many definitions of rape (such as the FBI’s) only define rape in terms of penetration, i.e. inserting tongue, penis, finger, etc into vagina, mouth, anus etc, of COURSE the statistics show that rapists are predominately male. A lot of MRAs then argue that if the definition ALSO included envelopment – that is, a woman enveloping a man’s penis in her mouth, anus, or vagina forcibly or without his consent, then the statistics would show that women are rapists more often than shown now and that men are victims more often than shown now, which is perhaps a logical conclusion, but a lot of them take it to the point where they argue that when accounting for envelopment men are EQUALLY or MORE likely to be raped than women, which is where I start to dissent.
Which is why I said “I’ve heard some MRAs conclude otherwise…” following the sentence “Rape, itself, is a primarily female problem.” I was saying that there are people who argue otherwise, i.e. that rape isn’t a problem primarily faced by women because the statistics are skewed due to bad definitions of rape. Again, I haven’t been convinced of this but I was mentioning it for completeness’ sake.
