The townhall debates have often been important. If Obama can channel a little Bill Clinton he can turn things around.
But if Obama’s the ivy tower professorial type we on the right make him out to be… Well, things could get even worse.
The townhall debates have often been important. If Obama can channel a little Bill Clinton he can turn things around.
But if Obama’s the ivy tower professorial type we on the right make him out to be… Well, things could get even worse.
Bummer about your felony conviction.
While I’m pretty bearish on Obama right now, that seems like a buying opportunity. I’d put it around 70-75% right now - right where we were before the conventions.
This is very much like what happened with Obama in the last election cycle. A number of pundits immediately after the first debate were scoring it slightly in favor of McCain, because he more doggedly stuck to his talking points, often a recipe for success. But polls showed the public were more taken with Obama’s performance. Turns out that whole calm, thoughtful thing ( that pundits were already well aware of, so it was no surprise to them and didn’t factor strongly into their analysis) was perhaps a surprise to the American public at large. In other words Obama didn’t come off as a kook to a large number of people that hadn’t been following the campaign before, which translated into greater public comfort with him.
I think it’s actually been about 50-50 from the start. Maybe 60-40 if we assume Obama should maintain a 1-2 point lead on average throughout the race.
The difference is that in 2008 the public wanted to support Obama but needed to know that he was a credible Presidential candidate. In 2012, the public wants to remove Obama but needs to know that there is a credible alternative.
“The public”. Hmmm…doesn’t look like all THAT much of a majority, there. No, “the public” does not want to remove Obama. Republicans want to remove Obama. And not even all of those. Larry Pressler (former Republican senator from SD) just endorsed Obama over the weekend.
Obama’s job approval has been consistently under 50%, although it barely got to 50% during the President’s post-convention bounce.
that implies that a slight majority do not think he’s doing a good job. Presumably, they would want to remove him.
In addition, the last time the question “Has the President earned reelection” was asked, 54% said he did not:
That says that a slight majority of voters would like to replace Obama. If that wasn’t the case, there would never have been a race to begin with. It would have been 1984 or 1996 all over again.
But the public isn’t monolithic. You make it sound like everyone wants to get rid of Obama when that most obviously isn’t the case. Why do you have to do things like that? Why can’t you just say half the country wants to get rid of Obama?
ETA: I realize that’s what you’re doing now, just not in #486.
It wasn’t just the pundits that said Romney won. Surveys by just about everyone doing surveys on who won debate found that debate watchers felt Romney won by huge, often record-setting margins.
Not even close to that either. Close to half the voters, and Republicans are more reliable voters than Dems.
It wasn’t just the pundits that said Romney won. Surveys by just about everyone doing surveys on who won debate found that debate watchers felt Romney won by huge, often record-setting margins.
Not true. You also seem to be relying on a weird definition of “bounce.” The Democratic ended a month ago; even before the debate you could not Obama’s improved standing a convention bounce. Those were gains in the polls. The whole concept of a bounce is that it’s temporary and short lived. You’re not the first person to do this; some Republicans seems to have decided that any gains from the convention should be called a bounce in the hope they will just go away.
Anyway, Obama’s job approval rating remains over 50 percent.
“Do you approve of the job he’s doing?” and “Should someone else be president?” are different questions. That’s particularly true in a one-on-one election.
Actually Obama’s job approval numbershave held up remarkably well during his post-debate polling slump. He is currently at 53-42 in Gallup. This leads me to suspect his poll numbers will also bounce back in the next few days.
Errk! A bot!
No, not a bot, just a double-tap
I actually think Democrats are doing exactly this same thing with regard to Romney’s gains in the polls following the debate.
Well, as I posted in the Ohio thread, Nate Silver’s latest tweet says:
I’m guessing this swing isn’t in Obama’s favor…
How did you double tap five minutes apart?
Convicted of being a British citizen, as it happens. Nearly as bad.
I blame Bill Gates. IE9 sat there and spun for a few minutes, I thought it was stuck so I refreshed the page.