I’ve never watched the Kardashian “reality” show and Kim Kardashian to date has just been sort of background buzz you hear occasionally attached to some TV show, celebrity wedding, or Kanye West news item.
Anyway there was a NSFW news item on Gawker (link below) the other day where she posed nude for some NY metro hipster magazine and honestly her body (if real) is absolutely amazing in it’s voluptuousness. Is that all silicone or is it real?
Somewhere there are before and after photoshop photos. They took in her waist/torso. And maybe they used a wide angle lens. She seems to be making bank from making lemonade out of lemons.
Yes, the waist on the rear shot does not match the waist on the frontal ones. Same with the side shot, the curve has obviously been accentuated. There was a nude shot of her in the recent celebrity leaks and she did not look like that. She could certainly have toned up and bit knowing she was going to do this, and the frontal shot looks real enough.
At least some of the pictures are fake, but not photoshopped, apparently. The photographer has a track record of photo-fakery (often of pictures of naked women) going back to before computer image processing became a thing.
You know how a balloon shoots across the room when you let the air out of it? I want to stick a pin in one of her cheeks and see if her body does the same thing.