I’m tired of asking you to cool it with this stuff. This is a formal warning: if you’re posting in this forum, do it without the hostility (and the accusations of lying and insults I already told you about).
It seems that, so far, all you have is innuendo. I’ve already cited how the actual findings (which you’re quick to trumpet when you think they may be of use, but ignore when they’re not), which were that the “dancing Israelis” had absolutely nothing, at all, to do with 9/11.
Yet again, what exactly is your argument, and what logic are you using to support it?
This is hardly an unreasonable set of requests. Do you have anything, at all?
I have no idea what you’re talking about.
I’m merely asking if you think the Israelis were behind 9/11.
So, do you?
I was making a joke.
It’s a reference to a very popular novel in Iran called “my Uncle Napoleon”.
Amongst other thing the Uncle Napoleon was incredibly paranoid about the British.
One of the themes of the novel was how paranoid many Iranians were about Britain and how they saw the British behind every bad thing that happened to them.
He is a highly respected and courageous British war reporter and journalist working for a high quality broadsheet and has more knowledge of Middle Eastern affairs than the entire NYT Foreign Affairs desk.
That he does not see the world through the eyes of the US Right or Israel is neither here nor there.
He has written several great histories of the region also.
So then you think it’s wrong to hold the fact that he is a truther against him?