The term, COP, is not derogatory. We have somehow turned it into a negative term. It goes back to our origins in Europe. It means Constable On Patrol. In Europe, even today, they use the term Constables.
Just a side bit of trivia: The term Sheriff was originally Shire Reeve in Europe. We were a bit lazy in our speech, and the Americans believed it was easier to pronounce Sheriff.
I am a little confused about the Snopes. I was a criminal justice major at the University of Baltimore. They discussed terminology that is used in law today and where it came from. That was taught to us as well as in the textbooks.
I definitely do not want to be argumentative. I’m only clarifying where my information came from. Now, my education on this goes back to 1991, so it is always possible that it has changed since then.
I’m more comfortable with that acronym because Constable On Patrol is not negative. I do not want to disrespect police, so when I was taught that, I was quite happy with it. I don’t know if that is a bad thing or not. When I get time, I will try to research why they were teaching that and now saying otherwise.
It’ll be interesting. Thanks for your post. I do love to research.
You may find, as many of us have, that all sources of info are not created equal. Just because it is on the Internet does not mean it is true, in fact, often the opposite. Many sites copy other sites with nary a question; veracity is not important to them, hits and selling ads is.
Snopes is one of the best for accuracy (other than Cecil, of course!) so it should be one of the first places you check if ever in doubt about something questionable or in the category of urban legend, which is their specialty.
And SDMB has some of the smartest people on this here planet (plus a few dipsticks), so you ignore us at your peril!
In general, stories that involve acronyms from before the last century are almost always untrue. COP definitely doesn’t come from Constable On Patrol, as that idea came up long after the word cop was in use.
Linguists have pretty much always known that this is a false etymology. The problem is that non-linguists love to tell cute stories about language, so they keep repeating false stories without checking.
Pretty much every story you’ve seen in an internet forward about wood origins is wrong – port out starboard home … fornication under consent of the king … bells that could be rung from inside coffins …
There’s a history of “sheriff” here that includes this:
As I mentioned in another thread, there still remains in rural parts of Canada the office of reeve (though it’s fast being replaced with its urban counterpart, mayor).
It’s pretty funny that I was gone for only four to six hours (I think) and this topic exploded. I agree that people take words from different languages and then claim it to be history and truth.
You learn something new everyday. I never call a COP to his face because of the negative connotation that goes with it. I use either officer, or policeman.
This was definitely entertaining conversation though!
:eek:
Well, there was that Internet thing that Al Gore invented, that made searching for this kind of stuff a lot easier, which we didn’t have in 1991.
But back to the OP: I’ve heard that Jack Webb changed changed his introduction to Dragnet in the 1960s version from “I’m a cop” to “I carry a badge” because some officers objected to being called “cops.”
Hey, no need to :eek:! I think it’s been an interesting discussion. And I’ve definitely had textbooks and classes that contained incorrect information on word/phrase etymologies, so I know how that is. It feels extra annoying, because they’re supposed to be the sources that debunk those things, not spread them!
Not only that, but you made the thread pop up and I got to read a hilarious Simpsons quote I had forgotten about (“it’s the cops!” “worse, the police cops!”).
I hope you stick around the boards! You seem pretty damn cool.
That was my Major also, it was an interesting Course. We learned about the Bertillon System of Identification, the 3 types of fingerprints and of course the basic foundation of S&S, Terry v. Ohio.
One teacher told a story of how a defendant beat a ticket rap because the Officer was not wearing his hat, not so now, by case law.