I ‘noticed’ there are websites for ‘porn’ for about every little predeliction you could imaging – blondes, redheads, greenheads, tattoo freaks, etc. But there is one group of females i couldnt find – ugly girls. They have ‘big’ (fat) girls, old grandma porn, but plain ugly ive never seen.
Is ugly the one ‘kink’ that doesnt exist yet? Is this some kind of niche that a porn entrepeneur could exploit? Might be weird having to reject girls for being ‘too pretty’
Just a WAG, but guys don’t usually fantasize about making love to an ugly woman. Some do imagine fat girls or even the elderly. Most guys fantasize about banging the hot chicks. There are some guys that have made it the industry with less than average looks so the common man can see himself in that situation, thus Ron Jeremy, but if you are looking for video of less than average women, check out amateur porn.
SSG Schwartz
I’ve not heard of it.
In high school, there was this one overweight and really not-so-good-looking girl who had a different Truly Hunky Black Male boyfriend just about every other week. Whether this showed her personal tastes in man color or if its a particular social thing, I don’t know. But the moral of the story seemed to be that if you are willing to put out, there’s plenty of guys (even good looking ones) in the world who are perfectly happy with whatever you look like. And, most likely, the reverse is also true: If you don’t care what your date looks like, it’s pretty likely you can find a bed partner.
Lack of availability leads to more porn than when someone in your fetish is readily available and willing. Cynical, but that does seem to be the truth.
I heard mention once of a site that featured girls with attractive bodies but homely faces.
I’ve actually seen a DVD like that in a local “adult” store called Lover’s Package. It was titled something like “Ugly Girl” and boasted that you could jerk off to this unattractive women. She actually didn’t look all that bad. Unfortunately when I went back a couple of weeks to check back, it had been sold.
It doesn’t exist because it’s easier for guys to just go pick up ugly chicks. Duh.
Edit: Sage Rat seems to have beaten me to this, albeit in a more nuanced way.
Isn’t “ugly porn” a contradiction? No one is going to get off at anything “ugly.”
If someone is enjoying a particular porno, then he probably finds someone in it attractive.
If you define “ugly” as “not the mainstream idea of beautiful”, then there is plenty of stuff out there.
Um, HELLO, rule 34?
Ahh, “butterface” porn.
Yeah, it exists.
Yes it does. Google “all kinds of girls”. Not so much “bone ugly” but plain everyday women, all lot of them somewhat frowzy and overweight, the kind you see working in offices, factories, and at Walmart.
Not so much “erotic” for the visual angle, but more interesting for the authenticity because this is the first time (it appears) that a lot of these women have appeared on camera, although I would bet some money that many are/were probably “swingers” in one form or another.
The sex is not all that aesthetically exciting re watching a soft bodied middle aged woman who is 30 - 80 lbs overweight get plowed, but her heavy breathing, grunts, squealing, moans and reactions as she approaches orgasm are real, and in some ways that’s more interesting than watching actors.
Rule 34?
Rule 34: “If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions.”
It exists. I’ve stumbled across it. I’d say more, but I didn’t stick around long enough to learn much about it.
Oddly enough, I often find the women (and men) in amateur stuff more attractive than the odd, plastic-faced stars of high gloss movies. Of course, if they’re too rough looking it kills my hard on, but then so does a pair of painful-looking fake boobs. So it just takes some searching. To each her own.
I don’t doubt that there’s a particular segment of viewers who, for some reason or another, want to see ugly girls ‘get theirs’ or something. I’ve read enough porn boxes to know that ‘These UGLY sluts are so desperate for cock they’ll let ANYONE fuck their ugly faces’ wouldn’t be too far-fetched a description.
You’re absolutely correct.
I agree.
scrambledeggs, you have been warned about this repeatedly: read the descriptions of the forums here and post your threads in the right place. This threads belongs in Cafe Society, which is “Our salon for art, drama, literature, movies, music, comics, cuisine – all the artistic disciplines – if it’s about creativity, entertainment, or leisure, it goes here.”
It’s not hard to find the right forum for any question. Any particular reason you’re not making the effort? This thread is locked. Sorry if people found the discussion interesting; feel free to open a new one in Cafe Society if you are so inclined.