@manson1972 & Little Nemo - while I don’t totally agree with Urbanredneck’s comment - I could not disagree with your dismissal of the comment even more.
20 years ago I was a Director at a “Fortune Top 50” (13 direct employees plus 50 indirect) and we had an explicit policy that we were to never discuss personal lives with any employees. I signed documents indicating that I understood this policy and if I violated I could be reprimanded and possibly terminated (without compensation) if violations continued.
If a subordinate initiated a conversation and discussed personal lives I was to politely listen and then change the topic. I was never to ask them questions or probe further.
The rationale was that some employees (especially females) did not feel comfortable sharing personal information with managers. Unwanted questioning was considered both a form of harassment and and a violation of personal privacy. The policy was implemented as a direct result of employee complaints.
Bottom line was I used my judgement to discuss personal lives. For employees I knew & had a history with, we’d openly talk about family, kids etc. For new employees never.
This was 20 years ago, I’m no longer in that corporate world, but if anything the environment has only become more sensitive to harassment & privacy issues due to civil and criminal litigation. Large corporations have always been in “cover your ass mode”.
Note:
- I’m not saying I agreed with this policy, I agree with you, there is a huge difference between harassment and chatting, but some staff did not see it that way so a policy stopping all personal discussions was the only option.
- I’m not saying this was the case with the OP’s comments, (I would fall on the side of narcissism, especially in peer to peer relationships), but to suggest as you two do, that is never a factor is 100% incorrect.