[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]
Nineteen posts and nobody’s mentioned the illegality of travelling ANYWHERE with a severed human head unless you’re a medical examiner??
I’d call bullshit on this story on that count alone.
Please. :rolleyes:
[/QUOTE]
What do you mean? That’s exactly why the article says he was arrested. So I don’t see your point.
[QUOTE=Rigamarole]
What do you mean? That’s exactly why the article says he was arrested. So I don’t see your point.
[/QUOTE]
The cops got duped too… ? It can happen, in the heat of the moment. If the piece is a prop, it’s not illegal to transport.
Uncommon Sense is right. The thing is a fake. Human blood dries to the same color tone. Would it dry faster thinly spread on the face, opposed to an area saturated like the torn-apart neck area? Sure. But c’mon, this “head” has been in a guy’s BAG?
It’s a latex prop. People see what they want to see.
[QUOTE=Cartooniverse]
The cops got duped too… ? It can happen, in the heat of the moment. If the piece is a prop, it’s not illegal to transport.
Uncommon Sense is right. The thing is a fake. Human blood dries to the same color tone. Would it dry faster thinly spread on the face, opposed to an area saturated like the torn-apart neck area? Sure. But c’mon, this “head” has been in a guy’s BAG?
It’s a latex prop. People see what they want to see.
[/QUOTE]
I got the feeling that the picture used the the news story was the fake, as opposed to the actual head from the story.
**
it’ll take you to the photo.
And to all; yes the photo is a fake photo used to illustrate a real story. The guy was carrying a real head. The photo in my link was of a fake head that someone at MOPO.CA used for their story.
Uncommon Sense is right. The thing is a fake. Human blood dries to the same color tone. Would it dry faster thinly spread on the face, opposed to an area saturated like the torn-apart neck area? Sure. But c’mon, this “head” has been in a guy’s BAG?
It’s a latex prop. People see what they want to see.
[/QUOTE]
Someone a few posts up linked to the exact head for sale on a website.
Looking at the rest of the stories on that site, they frequently have an entry that mentions an article, then a photo which is tangentially related to the article while not actually claiming to be a photo from the story itself. It seems like this is the case with this story. They wanted a graphic for their “guy caught with severed head” story, so they googled up a graphic of a severed head, not caring if it is real or fake. It’s just for effect. We have no reason to believe that the guy who was arrested didn’t have a real severed head, nor any reason to believe that the linked web site is claiming to have an actual picture of the head found in the luggage.
Here [NSFW]is a perfect example. It’s a story about an officer strip-searching a prostitute, and the accompanying photo is of a group of naked women lined up against a wall as if they’re going to be frisked. It obviously has nothing to do with the story.
That’s as maybe. But I recently picked up a photography book called Anonymous and was confronted with 2 shots of a grisly car accident on a rural road sometime in the 1930s. The car was totaled and lying on its right side, the driver crumpled beside it – his head lopped off by some unknown force – and rather neatly, I must say.
Stranger yet, said head was some 20 feet in front of the car –resting neatly upright in the road. A medium closeup of just the head was also taken: it looked as if the poor bastard had simply been buried up to his neck in the dirt.