Perhaps I’m completely wrong and it’s a regional thing, but despite being potentially grammatically correct, as a former Catholic, I’d never refer to a priest as a ‘preacher’ per posr 328. It’s possible the OP was trying to avoid being decried a Catholic, but if his faith is strong…?
As for the lawyer claim, at most I’ll give him the attribution of ignorant law school student-nowhere close to RNATB or jtgain despite my disagreements with the latter.
But please troll, stay; you’re fun!
Kicking someone in the balls strikes a nerve. If someone did that to you would you say they were on the right track?
You’ve never seen someone become very annoyed with a mosquito that won’t stop buzzing around their head?
That’s kind of what you are, a mosquito, or a flea. You’re just an irritant.
you don’t seem to understand the difference between irritation and frustration.
False dichotomy - define “truth” in this context.
::derp::
Meant ‘Pastor.’
tl;dr Troll.
It was his constant switching between Catholic and Protestant idiom, with the occasional random thing that didn’t fit either, in this and other threads, that first prompted me to ask his denomination, up-thread. It was twigging my troll-o-meter pretty heavily.
And this shows that you don’t even understand what “coherent” means.
Sharing the truth like like teaching evolution in schools, the separation of church and state, and sharing the benefits of science (or as you like to term it means to an end)?
Or do you mean more actively like uniting under the banner of the Atheist Sun and spread the cold logical TRUTH to all those who are holding onto their petty superstitions, vestigial from a bygone, ignorant age.
You know what I mean. When you ask me to further define, I know I hit another nerve. Human Action is much smarter than most of you.
If you had a truth that would make the lives of mankind better. Would an ethical man share it with other men?
According to atheists the answer would be “no, because we don’t have an agenda, we don’t believe in organizations.” And we’re not interested in leaving a legacy.
“Bzzzzzzzzzzz” “SWAT!”
‘Revealed’ truth as in “believe in christ and you can have anything you want if you pray hard enough”
Or
‘Factual, Objective’ Truth as in “Smoking has been shown to have a high correlation with x, y and z diseases”.
So - ‘Truth’ has a very differnt meaning depending on the context.
And yet again - you also make assumptions about atheists that do not fit the facts.
You’re a fucking moron.
I guess you’re not familiar with humanism.
He’s been told about that one. Repeatedly. With links. Didn’t seem to penetrate the concrete his head seems to be filled with.
Sorry, I haven’t followed the whole thread, but his MO seems to be to be to just ignore anything he doesn’t agree with. I would imagine that’s a very important ability for a dedicated theist.
pchaos talks about being an attorney.
pchaos takes heat over his profession
Others have trouble believing he’s a lawyer, too
pchaos posts “An Offshoot of First Amendment - The Freedom to Post”
More from elsewhere:
I’m not going to quote posts revealing where he claims to practice law, but people here aren’t the first to be shocked by it.
Ha. Fantastic. There were 2 “your/you’re” mishaps by pchaos on the previous page alone.
Troll. Bored now.
I was actually able to go from what you posted to find actual evidence he is, in fact, an attorney** - color me shocked.
He’s still a moron on the board - and not a good one at that - and apparently is well known for being a troll.
**I’ll leave the details to others to follow - I actually found a motion that was filed.
Yes, it was Human Action that brought Secular Humanism to my attention and I forgot to thank him.