I don’t agree with everything this man says, but his climategate stuff cracks me up
Balls in your court.
As **Gyrate **commented, it does show something alright, it shows that FX follows the same failure I observe in extreme conservatives, timelines do not exist for them, and he has to resort to opinion pieces, with no report on the several investigations and exonerations that already took place.
Willful ignorant is added to the list of FX’s “qualities”.
The article also shows that “climategate” damaged climate science in the same way that “You didn’t build that” damaged Obama and “What different does it make?” damaged Hillary. When you take data and statements out of context, claim they mean the opposite of what they actually mean and steadfastly ignore all evidence to the contrary, you will inevitably win over those too stupid to know better and those who don’t care what’s true as long as it supports their side of the argument.
It doesn’t prove who’s right, however; only who’s more brazenly dishonest.
You got ahead of me, dishonest was going to be added too to his list of “qualities”.
As it is his ineptitude that is demonstrated here by him not reading what was posted, back in post #28 the cite from the Union of Concerned Scientists reporting on the investigation and exonerations was posted, the cite FX used does not deal with them. So much for even his latest claim that the ball was in our court, in reality he has not dealt with the findings that the science was not affected.
If there was any honesty, people would actually be a little forgiving. But it’s actually like this topic. It is a foregone conclusion, in the mind, so there is actually no point in discussing anything, the warmist has made up the mind, closed that mind, thrown away the key and this entire topic is actually dishonest. Of course.
Not that the warmist can see this. But everybody else certainly can.
Yes, everyone can certainly see who has made up their mind and is impervious to all evidence to the contrary.
Piffle, remember that the main item here is your refusal to acknowledge how corrosive your **wrong **forgone conclusion was that climate gate was scientifically meaningful.
Everyone but you can see that.
But this is one of the reasons why a resource like Skeptical Science exists, you could had avoided the embarrassment of regurgitating reheated baloney, the sad thing is that by refusing to check what resources your opposition has and what the reports say you do then fall pray to the dis-informers and eventually like the Republicans that find that many do not agree with their “rape can not get an unwilling woman pregnant”. Getting caught with misinformation can indeed be embarrassing and then **damming **if you double down on the misinformation.
And as we all can see you did go double on affirming what the dis-informers told you. Glad we could figure out that we should not rely on what you say then.
nm
No no, that was pretty good
Yeah, but GIGO went and edited the post I was responding to.
That Bastard!
Yep, FX just self stamped himself as a certified hypocrite.
The tally so far for FX:
Trolling, cowardice, lying, quote molesting, being a tool of the Daily Fail and the banned Poptech, being a Jerk, a hypocrite, dishonest and can not read cites too.
You are a fine person
I know he is, but what are you?
Oh now that is real mature
I know I am, but what are you?
Don’t harsh my buzz man.
Taze him, bro’.
Excellent post.