Scylla:
No offense, but aren’t you sleazy, cheap, and slimy?
Yeah, right. No, no, that’s not offensive. Do you have any other compliments you’d like to send my way?
Look, everybody – it was just an offhand comment. Airman said he was “talking like a pinko,” and a couple of things struck me. One was the mystery of the failure of the left in the US: that many people (especially the poor) who would actually benefit from “leftist policies,” in a broadly general sense, are often those who are most fanatically conservative. They don’t seem to understand that they support policies which are directly inimical to their welfare. Why is that?
Another was the whole process of “radicalization;” that is to say, the idea that bad experiences tend to push a person in a certain direction politically, usually one against the status quo. I got the feeling that Airman was being “radicalized” by the shit he was going through, and that it worried him.
And no, it is not sleazy, cheap or slimy to bring that into the discussion. It was not an attempt to take “cheap political shots,” but rather to point out what I believe to be an important fact, one that deals with flesh and blood. It’s ridiculous to restrict political discussions to some sort of special, sanitized, abstract space, where we can open our gobs and just gas on about them. After all, the results of those policies do affect actual people. Airman, a good man who honorably served his country, now has, through no fault of his own, no job, no income, no health insurance, and no unemployment benefits. Due to an unfortunate fluctuation in the “market,” this good man may be reduced to cleaning toilets at minimum wage for a living, if he’s lucky. And it’s completely unfair, and it’s about to break him, understandably, and he’s practically blaming himself for something that’s not his fault. Shit like that can drive a man crazy.
Meanwhile, the fat cats keep on getting fatter. This the practical result of conservative politics in action. No wonder Airman’s going pinko!
Having said that, at the same time, I don’t indulge in the slightest bit of schadenfruede, nor do I find Airman’s situation particularly “ironic,” in any sense. Sorry, friend rjung, but I think you’re going a bit too far, there.
(Those interested can find the rest of my response in the Airman’s thread in GD.)