J K Rowling and the trans furore

Yes, of course that’s what I’m saying.

The more you come back to saying this, the more it looks like a canard to make what I’m proposing look crazy and infeasible, when really its the most practical and fair option for everyone.

If we both agree that transmen aren’t itching to be in the women’s room, then by extension, we’re talking about very few instances in which women would encounter a person who is female but presents as a man. Thus, if it’s only going to be a rare event, the normalization you’re talking about will not occur. Women will be able to expect that the only people in the room when they are naked are people born female.

I have to laugh at the idea that women are somehow unaccustomed to seeing masculine looking people in the locker room anyway. Women are a diverse bunch; the butch aesthetic has bee a thing for decades. It’s never been a big deal because a woman is a woman is a woman.

More of this “what about trans men?” canard? I already got the memo that trans women hate being associated with women, so when I hear hoof beats I think horse not zebra.

@Kimstu, when you said that the consensus of this thread is that everyone’s feelings are worthy of respect, you seemed to earnestly believe that. But if you look at the content of your posts, that respect is severely lacking. You seem to be bending over backwards to show how unreasonable it is to want biologically-based criteria for deciding which population of strangers should undress around another population. You’ve also been comparing the desire to have a penis-free space for undressing and showering to homophobia and racism. If that is showing respect for women’s feelings, I don’t know how you define respect.