Jefferson and Sally Hemings

I recently watched on CSPAN a presentation by the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society re a book they put out last spring. Here’s a link to their website with the book prominently featured.

In an effort to get the other side I went to wikipedia and The Thomas Jefferson Foundation web site.

From that website I have a couple questions that are likely to turn into a debate…

  1. “Although there had been rumors of a sexual relationship between Jefferson and a slave before 1802, Callender’s article spread the story widely.” … does any evidence of those rumors pre-date Callender’s article?

  2. “Ten years later, TJF and most historians now believe that, years after his wife’s death, Thomas Jefferson was the father of the six children of Sally Hemings mentioned in Jefferson’s records, including Beverly, Harriet, Madison, and Eston Hemings.” … all six children??? Is there any evidence of that or is just what "most Historians believe according to the TJF?

Yes, there’s been genetic testing pretty much confirming it. Wikipedia has an article on the matter.

This is the best single report. It’s by far the most in depth one, that includes all of the most compelling scientific and historical facts.

It is also to a degree by the nature of its publisher removes a good deal of the “fear of bias” for me personally. The Thomas Jefferson Foundation for many years had been very opposed to the “idea” of Thomas Jefferson fathering children with Sally Hemmings, they felt it tarnished the image of Jefferson. So for their report to be so in depth and to acknowledge and pull together all the evidence that points to Jefferson having a relationship with Hemmings really says a lot about how much is out there.

I will note this, because of the nature of DNA testing and because of the vast gulf of time it is only a well supported conclusion that Jefferson fathered several children with Sally Hemmings. Because of the nature of DNA testing it is in fact possible they were fathered by another male relative of Jefferson’s, however when you combine the DNA evidence that shows they were fathered by a male Jefferson, and you combine the historical evidence of which male Jefferson we know was doing what at what time, it is a vanishingly small chance that any male Jefferson other than President Thomas Jefferson fathered SH’s children.

“This is only what I see: like the patriarchs of old, our men live all in one house with their wives & their concubines, & the Mulattos one sees in every family exactly resemble the white children-& every lady tells you who is the father of all the Mulatto children in everybody’s household, but those in her own, she seems to think drop from the clouds or pretends so to think.”

– Civil War diary of Mary Chestnut

The DNA evidence looked at a male line descendant of Sally Hemings’ youngest child. That living person’s DNA was compared to a living male line descendant of Field Jefferson (Jefferson’s uncle.) Jefferson had no legitimate direct male line descendants so there were none to test against. DNA was also taken from a living male line descendant of Thomas Woodson (someone that people had suggested as a possible alternative father of Hemings’ children.)

What came out was that Eston Hemings was definitively not the son of Thomas Woodson, and that his male line descendants shared very rare genetic traits with the male line descendants of Field Jefferson.

That’s the scientific evidence available. I do not know if further testing has been done on male line descendants of the other 5 of Hemings’ children, and the limitation of this testing is obviously there is the possibility that one of Field Jefferson’s offspring fathered Hemings’ children, not Jefferson himself.

However when you combine the scientific evidence with the historical, it really removes virtually all reasonable doubt that Thomas Jefferson was the father of all six children.

First, Jefferson’s comings and goings are well documented. Hemings’ six pregnancies coincide with Jefferson’s visits and stays at Monticello, none of them coincide with the known movements of any other Jefferson. Randolph Jefferson (TJ’s brother) or his sons, or Field Jefferson’s grandsons could potentially have fathered Hemings’ children, but Field Jefferson’s grandsons lived very far away, and there is no historical evidence that links them to Hemings. Randolph Jefferson and his sons lived in closer proximity, but there is no historical record at all showing that Randolph Jefferson’s movements or Randolph Jefferson’s son’s movements coincided with Hemings’ pregnancies.

Further, while these are scientific possibilities, it should be noted that the historical record is totally absent of any allegations that Field Jefferson’s grandsons or Randolph Jefferson and his sons fathered Sally Hemings’ children.

Basically you have to give a nod to the grandsons of Field Jefferson and Randolph Jefferson’s family as possibilities. But look at it this way, there is historical evidence that Jefferson’s movements put him at Monticello at the appropriate time for all of Hemings’ pregnancies. So if it was another male Jefferson, then their movements would have to be such that they too were always at Monticello at exactly the same time as Jefferson and exactly when Hemings’ six children were conceived. It is just highly unlikely.

Further, visitors to Monticello recorded entries in their diaries and in letters talking about Jefferson having fathered children with Hemings. This was not a deep dark secret at the time. It was not widely known, bu visitors and such were not kept in the dark on this matter. John Hartwell Cocke was a frequent visitor to Monticello and he wrote in his diary that Jefferson was a “notorious example” of the prevalence of Virginia of “masters with slave families.” A long time Jefferson slave, Israel Jefferson, also confirmed the paternity of Hemings children.

These are people who spent time with the real Thomas Jefferson in the real world, and these were their direct observations. These are people who in general were favorable to Jefferson, were close with him and friendly with him. It is unlikely they would make these things up. Especially John Cocke, why would he record a lie in his personal diary? That was primarily kept private in his own lifetime? Did he envisage that hundreds of years later some historian would read it and that it would embarrass his friend Thomas Jefferson? That’s just not a realistic scenario.

Finally, Jefferson freed some of his slaves throughout his life based on a variety of factors. Jefferson’s legitimate granddaughter noted that Jefferson had a practice of freeing certain slaves who had skills and a light enough compelxion to “pass” that they would be able to establish themselves as freed people. However, these were rare cases and it is worth noting that in none of these cases did Jefferson free entire nuclear families, nor did he free people under 30 years of age.

Only in the case of Sally Hemings’ family did Jefferson give an entire nuclear slave family their freedom, and for all of them they were given their freedom at a young age (before age 30.) This makes them extremely unique among Jefferson’s slaves at Monticello, and is highly suggestive that these were in fact Jefferson’s children and that is why they were given freedom upon reaching legal adulthood (I believe at age 21.)

You left out the “all six children part”. If there is conclusive genetic evidence that all six children were fathered by Jefferson, let’s see it.

n.b.: I agree with Martin’s excellent post on the subject. The historical evidence is very strong that Jefferson fathered all six children, even if the genetic evidence is lacking. There as so many factors that could make 250 year old paternity impossible to prove, genetically, so it shouldn’t be much of a surprise.

Why is this worth debating? The larger truth is plain and undeniable: African-Americans are the cousins of white Americans. (And of American Indians, too.)

It is possible that the children were fathered by another Jefferson, as IIRC both his brother and uncle had, ahem, access… The odds strongly favor Jefferson, though, and Hemmings maintained he was the father to her own children.

Because it’s about race and sex. What’s not to love?

That may be a larger issue, but it’s not the truth. While the vast majority if African Americans have white ancestors, few have Indian ancestors. It’s about on par with the “Cherokee Princess” meme among certain whites.

I recall US News & World Report being accused of being a liberal rag because they ran a piece on this issue around the time of Clinton’s scandals–like they were trying to make him look better by comparison.

Bolding mine. Could you give a cite for this, as it challenges common wisdom?

It’s worth debating because the world Jefferson lived in shaped race relations in the United States for the next two hundred years. The debate over Jefferson’s relationship with Hemings strikes at the very heart of who an American icon was and how we relate to him today. The debate was so intense for years because Jefferson was such an American icon. To criticize Jefferson was to criticize the United States. In the early 20th century, some historians dismissed the possibility that Hemings and Jefferson had a sexual relationship. They argued that Jefferson was too “effeminate” to have had that kind of relationship with Hemings. A strange argument, give that Jefferson hit on his neighbor’s wife and fathered plenty of children with his own wife. In was easier for some historians to swallow the possibility that Jefferson was “effeminate” rather than accept that he deigned to have sex with a negro.

Do you have a cite that a significant portion of African Americans have a Native American ancestry? As someone once employed in genealogical research, I was rarely able to show Native American ancestry for those claiming to have some whether they were black or white. i.e. I had to be nice about it as say “well, it’s hard to prove on paper sometimes.”

Among African-Americans I know, there is a widespread belief that they are part Native American. I cannot assess their claim, but I can attest that I have heard it from multiple individuals who don’t know each other, and I’ve also heard it expressed as common knowledge in the African-American community. That’s why I asked for a cite, either way: I am not in a position to know, but I’ve heard it stated as fact on several occasions.

I’ve never heard a compelling argument why he could be callous enough to own slaves, but too moral to have sex with them.

In my experience, the claim of Native American ancestry is equally widespread amongst whites. Cherokee seems to be the most popular tribe to identify with for some reason. I don’t know when it became trendy to claim Indian ancestry. There was a time when people hid that kind of thing, which is one of the reasons it’s hard to prove on paper. I did help a black man start his research and his family had a pretty interesting background. His grandfather lived nearly a century and was a Buffalo Soldier and I was able to verify that he had Pawnee ancestors.

There were certainly African Americans and Native Americans who produced offspring. Heck, just look up Seminole-Negro.

As I understand it, Cherokee is the most often-claimed Native American ancestry because it really is the most common native ancestry among mostly-white Americans. They were a fairly large tribe, and presumably the Trail of Tears dispersed them through the rest of the population.

It is my hypothesis that Native American ancestry is the go-to explanation for any “non-African” features popping up in a lineage. This is easier to deal with on the psyche than the more likely explanation of slavery rape. But the whole “I got Indian in my family” thing is so prevalent that black people openly mock it just as often as they perpetuate it.

African-American family history is often a mystery and this leaves the door open for all kinds of speculation. When people ask me about my non-African heritage, I say I know that my grandmother says her grandfather was Scot-Irish. She never met him, but I doubt she’s incorrect. And that’s all I really know for sure. But it’s also clear from my phenotype and that of my family that there’s a whole lot more than that going on. Family lore contains references to Native American ancestors, but we have no proof. But we have no real proof of our white ancestry either, though, other than “mulatto” references on census forms. So I usually tell people that I have a known connection back to Ireland, though it is distant, and that there may be some Native American ancestry in my lineage as well. I don’t do so to claim heritage that I don’t own. It’s just that if I’m going to accept the possibility that I have European ancestry based on heresay, I feel like I need to do the same with the Native American. I would feel weird if I didn’t (I feel weird when asked the question in the first place).

My geat-grandmother was an actual, real, live on paper “Indian”. I never knew that it was popular to claim it until I got older. My mother was at an arts fest once and a lady made a reference to something and said “them” and “us”. The lady was of some Indian ancestry, which was plain to my mother, but it took her about five seconds to realize the lady meant to include my mother in that category. Here’s my mom. Here’s my great grandmother via Ancestry.com (and yes, that’s her 100 per cent).

I never did understand the trend of claiming “brownness” or “other-ness”. Are white Americans really that boring?

Henry Louis Gates, the chair of the African-American Studies Department at Harvard, has debunked this claim.

Bluntly put, lots of blacks preferred to believe they had Native American ancestors rather than white ancestors.

Similarly, lots of whites in Tennessee and other places like to believe they had Native American ancestors rather than, to use the old phrase “a nigger in the wood pile.”