Incredibly, I have the official and definitive answer to this, and, annoying as Alex can be in his know-it-all mode (and a sweet job it must be, BTW), the Alex-doesn’t-know-his-own-phone-number comments are mistaken. When I tried out for Jeopardy a couple months ago in Chicago, there was an open period before the actual testing got underway in which we potential candidates were free to ask any Jeopardy-related question we had. In addition to questions that related to the contestant process, people also asked about specific contestants who had appeared on the show (like “Blind Eddie”), the formation of the game board, and the ever-inflappable Alex. One of the questions was whether Alex had to pass the contestant exam to keep his job every year (ha ha), and, surprisingly, the answer was that, while the specific proposition obviously does not merit an answer (my comment, not theirs), Alex does in fact take the tests (there are two) every year, presumably for his own entertainment and also to provide feedback to the developers of the test. So far, they say, he has always passed. (Passing requires getting 35 out of the total 50 questions correct.) Further discussion elicited the very clear and specific statement that Alex knows the “answers” (i.e. the desired contestant response) in advance, but that any extra commentary he makes (“Oh, you were in the right part of the country but the wrong province;” “No, that was a quote from a book by Newt Gingrinch, you were thinking of ‘The Straight Dope’, which is by Cecil Adams”) comes entirely from his own knowledge and is not provided to him or scripted in any way. They said that Alex does indeed have a strong, broad range of general knowledge just like any good Jeopardy contestant, and that any extra trivia he tosses in is strictly his own. If you want to say they were lying about it to put on a good front [shrug], I can’t prove they weren’t, but they had no reason to lie, and were quite forthcoming and candid in their responses to all the questions raised. I was willing to take them at their word on this one, and I am quite the skeptic myself. One would also have to wonder why the show’s writers would waste (or, for that matter, be permitted to waste) the time and effort of developing additional triva for each question when they have no idea what answers the contestants will give, which ones will be answered correctly on the first try and which will be missed by all contestants, etc. It would also waste a heckuva lot of game time if Alex paused after every wrong answer to pick from a list of scripted comments.
Didn’t think to ask how he views the questions (although obviously it is from something in front of him which doesn’t have to be “uncovered”, not the game board the contestants are looking at), but there are no pauses between the clue slection and the reading of the question that are edited out; the game is taped entirely in real time and such editing only occurs during lulls (contestants have unlimited time to decide about their final wagers, for one thing, and if you talked about your stamp collection for five mintues solid during the contestant chat, I’d think they’d edit you a bit) or unexpected delays (e.g. a pause in the game to check a contested answer).
“I’ll take Jeopardy trivia for $1000, please.”
cygnus, who hopes to someday take home a lovely parting gift, or at least a door prize.