The main issue is that they are cut too low, which really doesn’t accentuate–and in fact fights the natural lines of the human body. If they hooked up around the hip bone there wouldn’t be the poofyness in the front.
Oh, I see the problem, those aren’t panties, silly! They’re rubber protecters for use with cloth diapers, hence the extra poofiness.
thanks for the laugh this morning – it was muchly needed. also sounds like a major sig-line in the making.
(i’m still a Jessica Alba fan from the Dark Angel days, which is why i’m even in this thread. and yes, i looked. i’ve seen hellava worse in the way of underwear out there. they weren’t anything i’d ever wear, but they don’t some even close to the heinousness of those men’s whatever-wear that are shaped to look like an elephant’s head, with the trunk alledgedly providing a home for a much-fantasized appendage. don’t truth in packaging laws cover items like that? or is this classified under “Fantasy Wear” – as in somebody’s doing some world-class wishful thinking.)
I think they’re kind of cute in the front, but they’d bunch up in the back. Jessica Alba would look good in anything though, so I wouldn’t say the panties are unflattering on her.
Sorry, Dex, I figured that if they could print a picture on the cover of GQ it was okay to link to it.
But damn those are ugly panties.
I actually like those, on her… I don’t think they would look good on my wife though.
I think they’re cute, in a vintage sort of a way. They look like the panties that came with old-style babydoll jammies.
Her ass looks spectacular in those pictures. As far as I’m concerned, the panties do nothing to hide the beauty that is Jessica Alba’s ass.
Well, yeah, magazines are classy and informational, but anythign on that thar inner nets is filthy and bad for the kiddies!
[paraphrased by half the people I’ve ever met older than me]
Anything covering her ass is by default, ugly.
I’m going to have to agree, those panties are ugly.
<girlish cattiness> So is Jessica’s new hair. Ech. </gc>
That’s what I think. I’d definitely buy a pair.
Funny you should say that. I almost mentioned in my last post that I kinda dig her hair in those pictures.
I’m with you on the hair - brunette works much better for her, I think. The panties…not terrible, not wonderful. A little odd, at most.
My mom had a set of babydolls with panties like that when I was a kid. I loved that nightie. It was the classic style with chiffon gathered to a little yoke. Sunny yellow with orange… So pretty. I wish she still had them, I’d steal them from her.
The panties look OK to me. I’d wear 'em.
But I sure wish she’d left her hair alone. Doesn’t the world have enough bouffant blonde bimbos already? Jessica Alba looked great with sleek, dark brown hair. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
Ah, that explains the big granny panties.
Rule of thumb, then: junk in the trunk, not junk on the trunk.
And while I do think she looks better as a brunette, her hair is probably blonde because it’s that way in Sin City and Fantastic Four, her two big movies this year.
(Hair and panties aside…heh…I think she looks better now than she did on Dark Angel – James Cameron likes his eye candy with more muscle than I do.)
In this thread (with great links, I might add) it seems like everyone ( at least the guys) is just trying to get the opportunity to say “Jessica Alba” and “panties”.
It reminds me of the SPAM song
Someone better at it than me can change the word spam above to some combination of “Jessica Alba”, “panties”, and “ass” and form a delicious new song.
Ass! Ass! Ass! Ass!
Ugly Paaanties! Wonderful Assss!
Ugly Paaanties! Wonderful Ass!