Jill Stein campaign thread

It’s not his fault for using older terminology. It’s clearly the “Kiev Zio-Nazi government” that has affected US social norms with respect to language. :stuck_out_tongue:

Uncle Tom has been used on black conservatives for awhile now. Since to the Green Party, Obama is a conservative, they get points for consistency.

Jill Stein’s campaign flies to the wrong city. Not surprising from a party that holds their ‘convention’ at a college campus and failed to notice that the only restaurant nearby was a McDonald’s, which pleased the self-righteous vegans immensely .

Jill Stein faces federal charges for vandalizing construction equipment at the Dakota Access Pipeline construction site.

Lock her up!

So all the people who can’t stand “Crooked Hillary” now have to choose from:

  1. A man who bribed the Florida Attorney General
  2. A woman who vandalizes property
  3. A man who now has a fake VP as his running mate. (Some of us)
  4. A man who’s party wants to destroy the Federal Government
  5. Hillary Clinton, the most criminally investigated and smeared candidate in history… with not a shred of evidence to support these investigations and smears.

Jesus. Fucking. Wept.

How people aren’t making the logical and moral decision is beyond me. Well… it’s not. But it’s apparently beyond them to even see the issue.

A warrant has been issued for Jill Stein.

As of now, I am declaring her a Fugitive from the Law!

And isn’t it insane that the Green Party candidate getting arrested likely won’t make the top-10 of crazy things to happen this election?

A Green Party candidate not getting arrested or having a history of arrests would be a big surprise. Isn’t that what lefties do when they are bored, get arrested or chain themselves to something?

Possibly true, but getting arrested during the campaign seems a rather desperate move for votes.

You saw the part where she got arrested 4 years ago too? That one was for trying to force her way into a debate. Arrest isn’t a new campaign tactic for her. Desperate times call for desperate measures. After all nobody is paying attention to her position that wifi is harming our our children.

Think of the children!:smiley:

That’s right, I forgot she has been down this path before.

Still, better than armed takeovers of government buildings.

Good God, this crazy woman is now a 9/11 truther.

The Russian ‘invasion’ of Ukraine was an intervention in a civil war (and an intervention on the better side, at that). As for the Russian repression of the press, I don’t see why that’s any of America’s business. The experiment with liberalism had horrific results for Russia in the 1990s, so to the extent that liberal journalists are the ones being repressed, good for Russia.

In any case, I generally agree with Jill Stein’s pro-Russian stance, so as much as I dislike her ideas about vaccines and GMOs, I’m leaning either towards her or towards Darrell Castle (who also shares a general approach of foreign policy isolationism). Stein would be better on economic policy, Castle would be better on social policy, but either one would be acceptable on foreign policy, the set of issues I care most about.

I can’t stand Jill Stein, so this was pretty hilarious:

It also continues to demonstrate that many young voters are being ignorant and/or pissy in this election.

It is beginning to look certain that Hillary will win. But if she does not get a majority of the popular vote, Mitch McConnell will use that as an excuse not to confirm court nominees over the next four years. America needs Hillary to win big. Not just by a 48 to 42 margin.

Votes for (Jill Stein and Gary Johnson) are useless protest votes that will help 'ol Mitch get his justification.

It doesn’t look like McConnell is going to have that authority after New Year’s.

The Senate will swing Democrat so that’s not an issue.

But if somehow the Republicans stay a majority would a Clinton plurality mean anything?

The president won with less than 50% of the popular vote in 1948, 1960, 1968, 1992, 1996, and 2000. It’s not any big deal. Clinton doing so wouldn’t rank in the top 100 excuses McConnell could dream up.

Quite possibly, but by no means a sure thing.