Just to make bibliophage happy, here it is where apparently it can be said:
“Eat me jim”
For the benefit of everyone who hasn’t a clue what you are talking about: provide a link!
I have a feeling it’s in regard to this thread, though I haven’t a clue who Jim is, unless he’s referring to Jomo Mojo. I see a premature meltdown rapidly approaching.
Jim Morrison?
Jimmy Hendrix?
Jim Baker?
Jimmy Dean (actor)?
Jimmy Dean (sausage king)?
Jim Belushi?
Jim T. Kirk?
Jim Beam?
Jiminy Cricket?
Jim Lehrer?
Jim Thompson?
Jim Rice?
Jim Henson?
Jim Crow?
Jim Carrey?
Jim Nabors?
Gym Class?
Jim Courier?
I hereby dub samarm the Link Police. 
I second the Motion!
All in Favor?
AYE!
Jim Nasium…
[sub]haw haw haw[/sub]
Hamlet: How could you leave out Jim Croce - the legend of 70s folk!
Lola: Freeze punk! Lemme see your link!
Well folks, looks like school is out again. Batten down the hatches!
and Bingo was his name - o.
I would suggest doing a search of rico776’s posts. Like a fine wine, they … Aw, screw it. He/she’s more of a tool than I am.
And simply because I’ve been feeling paraniod recently: Is the 's after rico776 correct? I know it’s possesive, but the other thread said not to use 's with numbers. Also, is “than” correct, or should it be “then?” Thanks in advance.
Since the name contains numbers, the apostrophe is correct. And in that instance it is “than” not “then”. Than is used when making a comparison, then is used when establishing an order.
Thanks to the omnipresent Q.E.D..
No. It’s this thread about Jose Cuervo.
You’re an ass, rico. He was trying to help you and you didn’t get it. You compounded your idiocy by flaming him in GQ. He explained himself and you still felt the need to pit him. Get a fucking clue, party boy.
Haj
aaarrrrggh. What I meant to say was:
Thanks to the omnipresent Q.E.D.
Yeah, I really dig Q.E.D.'s informativeness.
[sub]Although I should have included the “'s” out of the bolding…[/sub]
rico is…not smart.
[Homer]A “gym?” What’s a “gym?”… Oh a gym.[/homer]
Wait-what was the original title?