Johanna, enough already!

A minor pitting but I didn’t want to hijack anymore threads.

Johanna, stop hijacking threads with your transsexual/feminist nonsense! I was delighted when you stopped posting 25973463 threads a day about your love for the vertical smile, but you still insist on interjecting your decidedly gendered self into threads which have nothing to do with feminism or gender and going off into inane tangents.

This interesting thread asks if the sexes really are separate. Your first post is a pointless

And it just gets worse from there. You of all people should know that gender and sex are too completely different things yet you blaze right in and turn a GQ worthy discussion into IMHO musings.

This thread asks about the practice of fathers naming their sons after themselves in the US. You insist on bringing feminism into the matter with

despite the fact that the OP was only interested in sons named after their father.

Perhaps you don’t realize that you are hijacking. After all, in the thread discussing Bill O’Riley and the offensiveness of “Merry Christmas” you complain

You were the one who brought your religion into the thread in the first place!

I understand that a lot of newly out gay/lesbian/transgendered people get overly enthusiastic about their gender identity/sexuality but it’s been over year since you first came out. If you want to talk about feminist, transgendered or cunt munching then start your own threads or post to ones already involving those subjects.

Up until this thread, I thought that “vertical smile” referred to the ass.

I learned what “vertical smile” meant back in the 80’s, when the hair band Warrant considered using it for the title of an album. They opted for Cherry Pie instead.

Oh, I don’t know - anyone who will brag about spending the weekend having lesbians read Etruscan love poetry (or whatever the hell it was) gets some points for sheer chutzpah.

Regards,
Shodan

When did they start spelling “pretentiousness” c-h-u-t-z-p-a-h?

I enjoy Johanna’s posts, especially those in GQ. I hadn’t found the gender stuff overpowering, though. In fact, up till this moment I didn’t know she was transsexual.

Urdu. And it saddens me that I know this without searching.

Same here. Apparently I was grievously misinformed by an episode of MAS*H.

Are you serious? It’s the only topic I ever seem to notice her posting about anymore.

The most common usage is a reference to pussy.

I dunno. The post that set off the OP seems on topic to me.

Serious. Mind you, I didn’t notice Eve’s status until she pitted someone for something related to it. Perhaps I’m just slow.

The post?

I get the impression that Johanna is lesbian rather than transsexual, and that kimera’s use of “decidedly gendered” refers to her pride in her sexuality and female gender identity despite her complaints against rigidly defined gender roles and what-not.

Please correct me if I’m wrong.

Oh dear thank god. Someone had to do it. Hey, at least Johanna stopped using the word “yoni”.
From the Christmas thread in the OP also:

Yeh. And I’m an apostle. No. Really.

I’m sorry, just this gets you under the “batshit crazy” section in my book.

I am pretty sure that Johanna is both transexual and a lesbian. I understand that she was once a real-life example of “a lesbian in a man’s body”.

No, Johanna is transsexual, see my quoted post of hers in the OP. I don’t think she’s even lesbian, I seem to remember a post of hers where she said she was attracted to males as well. I could be wrong though, I did a search and came up with nothing.

An believe it or not, Johanna posted this:

Really? Because all I read was, LOOK AT ME I AM TRANSGENDERED! WON’T YOU LOVE ME LIKE KAITLYN?

According to that thread, transgendered for a year. I didn’t think you could “turn” transgendered, but hey, what do I know?
Another gem from that thread:

When the lights are down low enough, I can “witch” myself invisible!

The woman is enthusiastic about something and thus hijacks once in a while. Who cares?

Much better than too-cool-for-school neutrality and blandness.

Hey ma, look! No faults!

I’m having a hard time finding anything offensive or irritating about the cites you provided. So she likes to add her own perspective, so what? I’m admittedly biased due to her kindness to me in this thread, but I’d hardly call what she posts “nonsense.”