In case it wasn’t clear, no one in this thread gives a crap.
Whoosh.
I was visiting Youtube and at the top of the front page it had the following suggestion:
“9/11 Experiments: The Force Behind the Motion” by “physicsandreason”. It is produced by Jonathan H. Cole, PE (“professional” engineer). 2365 thumbs up, 100 thumbs down.It says “The smooth downward motion of the upper floors in the towers” weren’t explained in the official investigation…
He “investigates” the “pancake collapse” and the “pile driver collapse” models using physical models with a few dozen floors.
Here he “proves” that the “pancake collapse” theory “is WRONG!”
I guess that’s why NIST apparently said themselves that they don’t support the pancake theory.
Then he can’t find proper evidence for the pile driver theory…
“What about fire?”
He set his little model on fire to try and “replicate” the fires seen in the WTC towers… but it wasn’t quite the same so therefore the pile driver theory and fires aren’t a suitable explanation…
Next… “the controlled demolition theory”…!
Then he placed firecrackers on each floor and used a fuse to set them all off.
They exploded all over the place. While “not perfect, it looked like I was starting to replicate the motions we observed in the twin towers”.
He tried various fuse lengths…
“The problem was I was using basic fuses and firecrackers which are very difficult to time and control. But if I had remote controlled wireless detonators I think I could replicate the motions I saw.”
Some firefighters or something saying “it was as if they had detonators”!
“…so they must have used very powerful explosives”
The motion from his 2 initial experiments didn’t match the motions of the tower so “therefore it’s wrong”. “Yet my demolition experiment did”.
“…mainstream media have been lying about 9/11 all along”
“they hid behind their curtain of lies using complex math and computer simulations rather than real experiments”
“no one can make a simple experiment that can demonstrate the official force behind the motion”
Then a quote from Richard P. Feynman:
So why haven’t any whistleblowers confirming that there were explosives on every floor coming forward? I guess for the same reason that no-one blew the whistle on the moon landing hoax - because they’re scared of the retaliation :dubious:
There is one troll and one retard in this thread.
Can you guess who they are?
So the argument is that because he can’t replicate the effects of two massive fuel-lader airplanes colliding with really tall towers, that proves that 9/11 is a hoax rather than the fact that he’s crap at simulations?
Hey, I’ve just had a text from William of Ockham. He suggests a the rather more obvious reason no whistleblowers have come forward: because both “hoaxes” are bullshit.
Jesus Fucking Christ, JohnClay! - you really have become an exhausting cretin. Why can’t you just shut the fuck up and go sell crazy somewhere else?
So did Cole try flying model planes into his model towers?
Why continue to encourage the delusional?
It beats solitaire.
I might add, JohnClay, that Cole’s displaying all the classic characteristics of a disinformation agent. Watch out for those.
His other thread got locked. He HAS to get the truth out!
He doesn’t care about any particular truth, be it 9/11 or his wild nutritional/exercise ideas. He just wants to be the center of attention. Any kind of attention.
Since the target of this is no longer available to respond, I have closed it.