Heh. I wonder: is this his whole plan?
“You know, I could’ve won; I would’ve won. It’s obvious, right? All I had to do was mention Bill Clinton’s affairs, and that’s it; that’s it! But I have so, so much respect for Chelsea that I chose not to say that to Crooked Hillary; I knew being respectful could cost me the election, but some things are more important, believe me; believe me.”
LESTER: Mr Trump, you’ve said that you’ll release your returns when your audit is finished.
TRUMP: OH YEAH?! EMAILS!!! WHAT ABOUT HER EMAILS?! AND BENGAZI ,TOO! LEWINSKY! WHAT ABOUT LEWINSKY?!
:rolleyes:
The first debate was a bit of a let-down for those of us expecting Trump to be entertainment (a relief though). But I suspect the 2nd debate might be Trump unleashed.
CLINTON: Well, it’s also fair to say, if we’re going to talk about mayors, that under the current mayor, crime has continued to drop, including murders. So there is…
TRUMP: No, you’re wrong. You’re wrong.
CLINTON: No, I’m not.
TRUMP: Murders are up. All right. You check it.
Thanks for doing the legwork. Googled it this morning and Politico, that bastion of radical libertarianism, had a bit on it.
Why is nobody in the media jumping on Trump’s casual suggestion that China should invade North Korea, like war is just a board game? Christ, they disemboweled Howard Dean for a loud throat clearing.
Excellent observation. I just posted this to my FB page (with credit to you – thanks).
Bolding mine.
Um, so in other words, in 2016, as in now, today, the current year that is 3/4 over, murders are indeed… down.
Good rebuttal, man.
Clinton had problems with the truth, especially when she was warmongering. Her bit on Iran was especially disturbing, trumpeting propaganda from far right hawks about how Iran was weeks away from nuclear capabilities. In fact, Iran had given up on pursuing this years before and it was public knowledge that they had done so.
It’s sad she was not questioned on her apocalyptic plans for a no-fly zone in Syria. Recently the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said a no-fly zone, like Clinton favors, would require a war with Russia.
This is a sad time in US history. One would think questioning Clinton on her recklessness towards Russia would be of mild concern to potential voters. No.
One funny thing about this debate and Clinton supporters. They were so sure Clinton was going to calmly rattle off bits of awesome policy goodness. That didn’t happen. The only time she showed signs of life was when she was attacking Trump personally. That’s fine. These are two disgusting individuals who should be attacked. It’s obvious by this thread and other analysis that the campaign formula = status quo^2 + 4(attack Trump). Nobody is saying “Oh did you hear that awesome policy Hillary highlighted.” Again this is a good thing, she holds very little sway with the public which is why I favor her victory, but it contradicts pre-debate hopes and expectations.
Use it in good health, thanks! 
I’m glad someone showed up who can read.
I think at least half of us can read. Nobody can see a point that isn’t there, though, Will. Let your light shine!
We aren’t talking policy because we are all playing pundit and voters don’t care.
But the truth is Clinton talked a lot about policy. She gave several multi-prong plans on things like policing and economic growth.
I agree that her foreign policy and national security policies are not great. But the bad parts of them Trump agrees with or would make worse, so there’s not much to discuss.
In his own words:
Can’t. He said he “can’t” release them because of an audit, but like I said this “can’t” had already been publicly corrected, so why was he allowed to so easily use the same excuse palm the question off last night?
If he said last night that he would release them after the audit, why didn’t either Clinton or the moderator immediately remind him that the audit doesn’t stop him releasing his tax returns and so why hasn’t he done so?
She did say that in those words. Not in a position to search for the cite right now. Maybe someone else will.
I wish someone would say “Okay, dickhead, don’t release your 2015 return until the audit is done. But show us 2000 thru 2014”
Trump reminded me of a little kid that hasn’t learned to blow his nose but instead sucks his snot back in every few seconds. Jesus, that was annoying.
Unless you’re a diehard Republican partisan, you have to conclude that Trump laid a massive egg last night. She was prepared and lively, he continues to be the kid that skims Cliff Notes right as the exam is handed out.
That was my original question, I’m not from the US and wasn’t going to stay up all night to watch it.
Not in America. The narrative is that Iran is a dangerous enemy who’s been six months away from a nuke for a decade and still might be making secret nukes after the deal. Talking up the advantages of diplomacy makes her the dove candidate this cycle.
If he skimmed any Cliffs Notes, it certainly didn’t show.
How is negotiating a nuclear reduction deal evidence of warmongering? Wouldn’t a true warmonger eschew negotiation in favor of saber-rattling and military adventurism?
Trump sounded like a fifth-grader trying to bullshit his way through an oral report on a book he hadn’t read. Brain working faster than his mouth? I’d flip that around.
Hillary did pretty well by comparison. There were times when she also was clearly winging it, and there was too much of the same vague cliché- and platitude-ridden politician speak, but good God, at least she knows how to put words in order.
I doubt Trump was on coke, if for no other reason then because a coke high doesn’t last 90 minutes, and there was no opportunity to sneak off stage for another bump. Jonesing in front of millions with an hour to go on the clock isn’t my idea of a good time.