Jonathan Chance, a moment?

[Skywatcher]

Avoid what?

[iiandyiiii]

It, obviously. Isn’t that clear?

[Bone]

I responded in post #520 of that thread:

@Bone

Not to speak for JC, but there may have been a page load cutoff in a fast moving thread.

This is instruction to drop the various off topic digressions that have transpired thus far in this thread. Those include (unless specifically relevant based on my judgment), but are not limited to: Bill Clinton, Biden, underage girls, violating consent. I’m including climate change too, just because.

[/moderating]

[Skywatcher]

Separate forum simulpost.

[iiandyiiii]

@Bone

I responded in post #520 of that thread:

I thought you weren’t speaking for JC?

[mhendo]

@Bone

I responded in post #520 of that thread:

I didn’t read the lead-up, but your response seems reasonable.

I guess the main issue is why the moderator in question took the time to weigh in, but not to actually explain what the hell he wanted from the participants.

[HurricaneDitka]

At the bottom of page 10, post #500, I wrote this:

@HurricaneDitka

I still think iiandyiiii’s support for the Dems, while Biden is their front-runner, undermines his professed concern over assault / harassment of women, but I don’t think it’s germane to the topic of this thread, so I’m trying to avoid further discussion of the topic here. Can we agree to drop it?

(emphasis added)

I assume JC’s mod note was in reference to that, and perhaps he hadn’t seen the posts on page #11 yet, but he can weigh in here and clarify if he feels so inclined