They could always pick up Hobby Lobby as a sponsor. It was Hobby Lobby who donated that building to Bill Gothard, where Josh did is carpentry counseling.
I hope this continues. Last evening on TMZ they reported TLC was still not firm on whether they would cancel all showings of the programs. It needs to go.
That just hit me. Rated R movies do not require you to be 18 to see them. “Rated R: Restricted – under 17 requires accompanying parent or adult guardian.” So you can be 17, and, under that, you need an adult “guardian” with you.
The whole thing was entirely for show.
I hope they’re not that stupid. (Which FJ thread is this on? I got lost with so many threads on this!)
Sorry, lel, I’m not sure. I want to say it was in one of the massive “Josh Duggar molestation” threads. Part three, maybe? But you’re right. They’re are so many it’s hard to keep up and I still haven’t read all of four yet because it pretty much just dissolved into speculation because no new hard facts were coming in. Great resource though.
Missed this. How anyone could support Gothard is beyond me. Don’t these people have any shame? Would it be different if it happened to them? Gah.
Um, yeah, that’s it exactly. Jim Bob is on record for calling for the death penalty for rape and incest.
Except when it’s his son touching his daughters, then, a little hard work and some praying is all that’s required. :dubious:
‘Only some fondling’, ‘in their sleep’, ‘only a few times’, —I seriously don’t know how anyone can believe any of these things. Keeping in mind:
Reporting to law enforcement = a year later, to a family friend / sex offender, grossly misrepresented actual circumstances, no investigation at all.
Punishment of Josh = praying and some hard labour.
Counselling for daughters = shaming, blaming and praying.
And it’s only come out now that the SOL is run out, and because they need the record destroyed!
These people have wielded power, influence and spin as competently as any Hollywood publicist or professional politician. I don’t believe they have spoken a single word of truth.
The officer convicted of child porn is now saying that he was only informed of one incident, and that he had supposedly only touched one girl through her clothes while she was sleeping. He claims that this was the main reason he decided not to report it.
He does also admit that, even if it was just one incident, he now feels he should have reported it anyways, and that he feels extreme guilt for his part in all this. He actually seems to be admitting more guilt than the Duggars themselves.
Ya *think *? :smack:
As much as I think these Duggar freaks should be vilified, if a convicted pedophile told me the sun was going to come up tomorrow morning, I’d tell him to fuck off and die in a fire.
This is too good not to share.
http://www.people.com/article/jon-stewart-larry-wilmore-funny-die-parody-duggars
So, yeah, it gets grosser. And Fox News, of course. I mean, yeah, if it’s gross - of course, Fox News is there. Wonder how long it will be before Josh gets his own gig there.
Well, a faux news network and a bubble-headed bleach blond are their best shot at spinning the family history of duggary.
REALLY? :eek::eek: I thought it was just fondli– oh wait, you said “duggary,” didn’t you?
Never mind.
I’m goin’ to hell, aren’t I? 
As I suggested above, the simplest way to solve the “labeling” issue is to add “duggary” to the language:
DUGGARY (dug’-er-ee): The act of sexual molestation of an underage close relative.
DUGGAR (v): To engage in an act of duggary.
DUGGARER (n): One who engages in duggary.
Perfect.
Now add SKULLDUGGARY: the act of concealing the sexual molestation of an underage close relative from the public.
https://defeatingthedragons.wordpress.com/2015/05/22/how-josh-duggar-is-getting-away-with-it/]
Here's how the Duggars' patriarchal homeschool world teaches kids to shame sex abuse victims - Raw Story
FYI your first link is semi-broken. One has to remove the extraneous ] at the end to reach the article.
Sadly, most of the girls he molested are also named Duggar. I’m not sure re-defining their last name to highlight their abuse is necessarily the way to go.