"Jurassic World" premise (spoilers, if you consider the basic premise of a movie a spoiler)

This seems to violate the basic point of the previous movies, that such a thing is impossible. You know, because of movie-version chaos theory (MVCT).

Not that I’m saying that in reality MVCT or something like it would made such a thing impossible. But in the universe of Jurassic Park, MVCT has been, in my opinion, established. Denying MVCT in a Jurassic Park movie would be like admitting, in a JP movie, that DNA could not survive in amber until today (like in our reality).

Anybody agree with me?

Presumably the movie is not a rom com at the park. Things will go wrong, it just took longer.

Ugh, now you’ve got me even more worried.

No, after how many times I’ve seen idiots conflate any advancement in robotics with Skynet, I cannot say I would miss it if we saw a bit less fear of science in our science fiction.

I like the sound of that better than it being a reboot. I hate reboots.

How the heck can Jurassic Park accommodate 20000 people a day

They’re gonna need a lot more jeeps

I agree.

And despite my complaints about the concepts of previous movies seemingly being violated, I kinda like the functioning theme park idea too. I want another JP movie, and another that follows the same pattern as the previous three would be kinda pointless. I value entertainment over internal consistency.

Despite all the talk about Chaos Theory, the problems with the dinosaurs in the original movie were really just plain old Murphy’s Law.

Thats what I thought Murphy’s Law was - simply “Chaos Theory” for the masses.

There are things man was not meant to genetically engineer!

One paleontologist interviewed said the problems at Jurassic Park had more to do with bad zookeeping than chaos theory, and I think he had a point.

One could easily imagine a badly designed zoo that allowed tigers or chimpanzees or crocodiles to injure visitors. That wouldn’t prove that building zoos is inherently arrogant or dangerous.

And really, that’s all Jurassic Park is: A zoo. We know how to build functional zoos, and the same designs used for any other zoo would work for Jurassic Park (with some scaling, of course).

But that wouldn’t let Crichton rail against the shortsightedness of arrogant scientists, so of course that’s not what we got.

Well, SOMEone had to.

The rest of us were going, “Awesome! Fucking DINOSAURS!!!”

Impossible, they were all female.

Dinosaurs = Awesome.
Lesbians = Awesome.
Lesbian Dinosaurs = Not Awesome.

Queue the old “Lickalottapuss” joke…

And he had to throw in a criminal programmer and a huge storm to get his disaster scenario.

The novel went quite a bit more into the chaos theory and screw ups the creators had made, but even then there were plot holes. Plus an out for the new movie - the chief geneticist presented a plan to Hammond to destroy most or all the existing dinosaurs, and start over by engineering less aggressive, non-poisonous, and above all, slower dinosaurs so they’d be less dangerous and easier to handle.

Plus, how hard would it be to put a fail-safe device in the head of T-Rex (or any creature)? It could simply disrupts the brain with electrical signals, or worst (or coolest) case, blow up the head. I guess we might see that if Michael bay directs JW2 or JW3.

Probably extremely hard. How do you safely sedate your unbelievably expensive, nearly irreplaceable, park centerpiece T-Rex? Oops, too much ketamine, it died. Oops, not enough ketamine, it’s eaten the entire veterinary staff.

20000 people does not necessarily mean 20000 tourists.
Dinos gotta eat, y’know.