He’s a floater circling the drain at this point.
Your conclusion has nothing to do with the data you cite. You invented that yourself out of pure wackiness.
What we can say from your cited data is that the trump voters are more likely to believe the adverse false propaganda than Harris voters are to believe the reality.
Which is still a problem but not the problem you breathlessly cite.
I assume you also agree that fortune telling should be legal. And that legit banks should be able to set up fake storefronts and steal whatever gets deposited too. Plus folks selling shares in the Brooklyn Bridge is just fine in your book.
If [whatever] is legal at all, it MUST be regulated. Either prohibit it outright or regulate it correctly and thoroughly to be of unequivocal net benefit to society. We do that with every other financial instrument and intermediary. Why not with crypto? Claiming it’s all a scam and deserves to be used as a con to steal from innocents is barbaric at best, and an accessory to fraud at worst.
Bottom line:
If e.g. crypto is good, regulate it. If crypto is evil, ban it. Don’t leave it as a trap for the unwary and an income source for the criminal fraudsters.
I didn’t watch the Baier/Harris interview. But I’ve seen a few clips. Here’s a pretty good one.
It’s a xitter post, so if have that blocked, you won’t see it here.
I used to check Twitter for “public” reactions to events, but it’s completely taken over by bots and/or hyper-partisans. Completely useless.
I watched the Fox interview. I think she did well. Yes she evaded the gotcha questions but she did it skillfully and she was able to get back to her talking points fairly smoothly. That thing was a minefield and to badly mix a metaphor she didn’t give them any ammunition.
Kamla showed Fox viewers she wasn’t afraid to go into the lion’s den. I wonder if any of them will wonder why Trump is so cowardly?
You definitely can’t just raw dog Twitter these days. That’s why I only read a few accounts, mostly just guys like Acyn who clip and quote speeches and TV pundits without commentary.
This makes my bit of respect for Brett Baier drop to NONE. He’s a MAGA asshole if that is what the rest of that interview was like.
I watched the interview on YouTube. I love how she turned a disingenuous question about gender surgery for prisoners into an extended discussion of her economic plans. That was after stating that she follows the law, and that Trump followed the same law. Her superpower is answering the question she wants to, regardless of what she was asked. Which may turn off a lot of viewers, but I think she got important info into Fox world, and looked presidential doing it.
I shan’t hold my breath for Trump’s interview on MSNBC.
What about his two recent town halls on Fox News and Univision? 
I seriously wonder what folks at that town hall thought about that Trump gibberish. They had nobody to filter the crap and tell them what he “really meant”
It wasn’t really gibberish. He’s the father of IVF and he’s proud of it!
My housemate was watching Fox tonight and I think I overheard Laura Ingraham say something like this interview proves Harris will never take responsibility for anything.
The projection is predictable and just tedious by now.
Trump does the same thing, it’s just that the questions he likes are about crowd sizes, tariffs, and Hannibal Lecter. She’s trying to give good answers.
I mean I remember getting frustrated all the time at Obama for question-avoiding and I can think of a few specific jokes about it from Yes, Minister- this really is just politics 101.
I’m at the rally in La Crosse, Wisconsin (I walked to it from my house)…Kamala will take the stage within the hour. My wife and I are only five rows back, close to center stage, because I had done some canvassing for the county Dems. (Not a lot, though! Many here deserve more). We’re in our university’s gym…a student just took the microphone. Good energy.
The Hill, almost like Fox, says interview was a disaster. It was a disaster for the host, not Kamala. He was failing so baddly the producer cut the interview short. https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/4938609-kamala-harriss-fox-news-interview-disaster-shows-how-the-media-set-her-up-to-fail/
To clarify, that’s the opinion of one Becket Adams, not The Hill. From the top of that link: “The views expressed by contributors are their own and not the view of The Hill”
I am shocked that someone who also writes for the National Review and the Washington Examiner could arrive at such opinions.