He’s just OK looking to me. He is obviously quite fit, which is nice, but his face is average at best and his attitude stinks, so that takes him down many pegs.
Fit, not ugly, but not handsome or studly in my books.
Just studly. He’s not hideous, I don’t think, and his face and demeanor is more masculine than most of the lean, but muscular people I’ve seen on a lot of other people. Runners just seem like girly men to me. 
Michael Phelps, on the other hand, just looks like a goofball. Armstrong’s age works for him in a positive way in this case. I don’t think he would have been as attractive when he was younger. Haven’t looked for pictures though.
Lance Armstrong - nice athletic body; bland, plain face.
Michael Phelps - too skinny body; hideous face.
I don’t really find Lance Armstrong attractive, but I did read It’s Not About The Bike when I was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer.It was the first book I read. Despite the fact that he had a completely different kind of cancer, the book was inspiring and it helped me a lot. I’m still here over a year later.
I don’t know what it is with him…he’s such a flawed character and does not have the ability to hang on to a woman, nor does he seem to want to.
He is neither handsome, nor oozing with big “T”! However, he does ooze with arrogance! Not sexy in my book!
Neither. He’s just a guy.
He’s not bad, but I wouldn’t step on my mom to get to him or anything.
he has a great house though - saw pics in a magazine a while ago.
I’d do him. I know for a fact the guy’s got stamina.