Damn, tremorviolet, you got you some guns there!
Fortunately or otherwise, I got nothing more to add to a thread that’s been dissing Frank Zane and Bill Pearl. If they’re bad, I don’t wanna be cute.
Regards,
Shodan
Why yes, it is helping me…thanks!
Obviously you are Canadian, which explains a lot, but the fact that you can name Tie Domi, while you can’t name Viggo Mortensen, is way hot.
When I exclusively dated thinner guys, I used to say, “If I can’t pick him up and throw him across the room, he’s too big.” 
I’ve branched out since then. I do like some muscle tone on a dude, but I still love a scrawny, skinny guy who pretty much has a flat chest. I hate it when a guy’s boobies are bigger than mine. All the lumps and bumps of a guy who works out a lot freak me out; however, some muscle and strength is a big turn-on (of course, all but the most freakishly underdeveloped men are way stronger than me in a manly,turn-on way), as long as the guy is “smooth” looking and not “cut” looking. the rule of thumb is, big lumps and bumps, especially in the boob area, are a sign that the guy is “too big”. Smoothness and leanness are way better.
I’ve really, really liked guys who were outside these particular tastes in looks, though. Once I get to know someone, I’m going to love them for what I see in their personality and intellect, not their muscles or lack thereof. I’m just speaking of what I like to look at. Don’t mind me.
Face it, us short guys are one of the last things in the world that it’s still OK to mock.
– Turek (who is 5’3" and ain’t getting any taller)
Bleurg. Gotta look at the Freddie Ljungberg picture for a while to clean out my eyes.