Is it soliciting sex for money though? It’s more of a prize for being seductive, since you win just before he decides to break his celibacy.
So ho isn’t slang for whore? 
It is.
And to some folks, the word “whore” has a fairly negative connotation. Hence, ho is derogatory.
However, it sounds as if there are some who think that trading sex for money is not in and of itself a negative thing… hence the dialog there.
Wait - so because I give sex away for free instead of charging for it, that makes me morally self-righteous?
Uh, ok. If you say so.
I have nothing to add to the conversation, I just wanted to see this sentence in a quote box.
Anyone looking for a new sig? 
As others have said, not in Clark County. And it’d have to be in a licensed brothel:
Thankyou for explaining what i assumed was a fairly straightforward and simple concept, but which seems to have eluded some people.
Interesting.
What happens, i wonder, if there’s a sudden real estate boom in one of the counties that has brothels, and the population expands over 400,000.
I demand proof.
I think mhendo is objecting to your statement that you wouldn’t do it, because you’re not a ho. If there is no negative connotation to sex for money, than it would be like you saying, “I won’t unclog your toilet for $100,000, because I’m not a plumber.”
Or, are you saying you wouldn’t unplug a toilet for $100,000? :dubious:
Uh-huh. We know it’s never really free. 
alice_in_wonderland, you probably don’t know who I am, but I usually enjoy your posts and I almost always agree with what you have to say. But, in this case, you did sound like you were jumping on the soap box a little bit. Maybe you didn’t mean it that way, but I think that’s the way mhendo took it as well.
For me, it was the “Uh, I’m not sure that legality is the ONLY issue here…” that changed it from stating your opinion to judging others, and took it into preachy territory. (And actually, using “uh” three times in a row…)
Back to the OP, it almost sounds like this guy is trying to play into the human condition of wanting to rise up to a challenge. I mean, if he’s got the money to blow, what’s to stop him from being like, “Yeah, I challenge you to seduce me… Just go ahead and try.” and then just take his pick from the many beautiful women who will surely think of it as a game? Sounds fishy to me… and I wish I’d thought of it first.
Couple possibilities:
-
The statute says that licenses can’t be “granted” if the population is over 400,000. So the existing brothels could claim they were grandfathered.
-
Statute gets amended.
-
Brothel moves to the next county with a population less than 400,000 that is brothel-friendly.
They’re no worse off than if the county decided to ban prostitution. The Nevada Supreme Court held they could do that: http://www.nevadaindex.com/kuban.pdf
I don’t even want to get started on the innuendos.
But you missed “sounds fishy”!
That was my thought, too.
And the beauty of the scam is that none of the gullible ladies who might fall for it would be able to force him to pay after the deed is done. So he really doesn’t even need to have “the money to blow.”
I don’t buy it. He’s a rich guy in Las Vegas. Even the most high-priced call girl is going to be a far sight cheaper than $100,000, and I’m sure he can have his pick of women who just want to get with a rich guy for free.
I think the $100,000 is supposed to be motivation for him to maintain his celibacy – he now knows it will make the papers if he cracks, and cost him a chunk of cash at the same time. Sure, it’s dumb, but if you’re looking for attention, it’s not a bad way to go about it.
You’re right. I was judging the disgusting ponce that put out a “Call to women in bad circumstances to try to fuck me for money.” as a disgusting wind bag.
Honestly, if he was really taking a vow of chastity he would just not screw anybody. By advertising it he’s begging women to try to come on to him to get the money. I think he’s both pathetic and sad.
Furthermore, of you’re a guy or a gal that has sex for money, you are a ho. I personally have no problem with that, whatsoever. That just doesn’t happen to be my MO.
Because he’s got no intention of having sex?
I don’t think you offer up $100,000 to the first woman who can seduce you if you don’t intend on having sex.
Perhaps I’m just Cynical.