was this a popular enough movie that an average person would know about it if not have watched it?
Was the movie created before 1980?
Did the suggestion involve the crew making the cast happy?
startled?
alslslslsl
kkkkkkkk
Is the animal a mollusc?
Were the animals:
Insects? If so: social insects, like ants or bees?
Arachnids?
Sea creatures?
Able to fly?
Were they literally limp, as in floppy? “Lifeless” as in dead? Or appearing to be dead, but actually alive?
Did the director provide the animals with something that met a physical need, like food or water? Did he withhold something they physically needed, causing them to be more active in trying to obtain it?
- Molluscs?
- Arthropods?
– arachnids?
– insects?
– crustaceans? - Cnidaria?
– Sea anemones?
– corals?
– sea pen? - Onychophora?
Nope.
yepers
Was the movie a horror film?
Did the directory stimulate the insects’ motion by heat? By electric shock?
It was electric shock!
I’ll call that close enough.
I’ll post the full story for you:
It was actually that day they offered him Piranha 2, which is his first directing credit even though he only worked 1 week on it.
That must have been impressive to watch.
Does the SPCA get upset about treatment of mealworms?
In 1980 or 1981, probably not on a movie as small as that one.
In the year 2000, three sisters living in the UK took out an unusual £1 million insurance policy. The policy did not insure them against death, illness, property loss, or liability. They were all healthy and not involved in any risky profession or travel.
The company who issued the policy eventually canceled it even though no fraud had occurred and no claim(s) were ever made for it.
What exactly were the women insuring against, and why do you think the company eventually canceled the policy?
Did the company cancel because the event insured against did not occur when the sisters thought it would. As an example (not my guess) the sisters insured against being raptured by the second coming of Christ on 25/12/2000. When it didn’t happen, the policy was cancelled?
That year seems like it is important. Clearly not insurance against the Y2K bug, but was getting the policy in 2000 specifically important?
Is the fact that they were sisters a key element?
kkkkk
Were the sisters related by blood or adoption? If not, were the sisters members of a religious order?
Was the insurance against something occurring that most reasonable people would think unlikely?
Did the policy get cancelled because something about what was being insured changed?
Did the policy get cancelled because while it was an insurable event when the policy was written, something occurred later to change that?
Is the amount of £1,000,000 significant in any way?
Irrelevant, so we’ll say “by blood” as it is the most common. No, not nuns or something religious order related, just sisters as in they have the same parents.
Yes.
No.
No.
No.
Something tickling the back of my mind. Did the policy involve someone getting married?