Latest Sarah Palin idiocy: Oh noes, I have neighbors! How awful!!

[Bogart]Of all the rental properties in all Alaska he has to rent next to mine. (takes drink) Play it, Sam.[/Bogart]

ORRRRR he decides to move to Alaska, contacts a real estate agent, gets a bunch of listings, see Wasila, laughs, looks at the listings, sees a house next to Palin for sale, and thinks, haha, I could live right next door to Sarah Palin wouldn’t that be a hoot? And buys the house.

And she believed them? They were able to keep “McCain’s Black Baby ™” under wraps so well and that wasn’t even a real scandal.

If she doesn’t like the attention, she merely needs to stop attracting it. The other truth about the media circus is when Brittney Spears stops being as crazy as a mad hatter, it changes its focus to someone currently crazier…and there is always someone crazier…

Brain bleach in Aisle five! :eek:

Or the real estate agent says, “This is a really nice property, but it’s going real cheap, because the next-door neighbour is crazy. However, she’s out of town most of the time…”

From the OP:

NOWHERE in there do I see anything about the guy writing a book ABOUT PALIN. His book might peripherally involve her, but from that description, she is not the subject of it.

I get that either is possible, but which is statistically more likely?

Since you asked the question, and seem to already know the answer, why don’t you tell us, and show us where you got your information about which is statistically more likely?

I’m terrible at math :frowning:

I mean really, though, c’mon- you honestly are telling me that it is just as likely that of all the homes in Alaska (or even Wasilla- which is where several of my friends live), he randomly drew the one next door to her house --than him specifically picking that house?

Specifically, the last link in the OP.

Yes; I’ve got three links in the OP, and only one of them is to her Facebook page.

But I had two reasons for quoting her FB page:

  1. because I wanted to get the parts in there where her complaints really could have been about anybody renting the house next door; and

  2. because this way, nobody can complain that I’m misquoting her, or citing a media source or lefty blog that misconstrued her words. Her FB page, her words, she owns them.

That. I mean, if I were a well-known author (as McGinniss is), and I came to Alaska to write about oil and corruption, and then I found out my next-door neighbor happened to be the governor…would I have some obligation not to mention that? My book would still be about oil and corruption, but I’d have to be crazy not to mention it.

Only two of the three links are about him moving next door, and the sole source of the second link is the blog mentioned in the first link. Are there any other links about this event?

The only info I can do with a quick and admittedly shoddy Google search is from his Wiki:

That was up before Palin’s rant, because I remember reading it when looking him up before.

You really enjoy grasping at straws, don’t you?

I must say that it’s been fun these last few minutes posting the link to the WaPo piece to the comments section of her “note”, only to have it summarily removed a couple minutes later. Of course, to achieve this, I had to click the “like” button on the SP page. I probably won’t sleep for a week.

Hey, MTCicero, in for a penny, in for a pound. Go repost it, along with a complaint about having it removed the first time. Tell them “But I said I LIKED the update.”

That must be it. I mean, so many people move to Alaska, Wasilla specifically, so often. It does seem that the more extraordinary claim is being made by you here…that it’s just a coincidence. So, demanding a cite from the more reasonable position stinks of the childish “cite, cite, cite” that so many like to play around here.

That said, here’s some substantiation from a lying right wing site.

Anything to bitch about Palin, right?

The guy is stalking her. His own son confirms it:

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0510/Annals_of_journalistic_enterprise.html

Or it could be that McCain, who had after all been in the spotlight for a long time, didn’t think the media attention was that big a deal and saw it as just a natural extension of working in the political arena.

How do you function here with a broken sarcasm sensor?