Lawrence Taylor arrested for raping 16-year-old

Then it’s forced prostitution. Doesn’t mean she can’t be raped. Prostitutes can still be rape victims.

I never said she wasn’t a rape victim. She’s a rape victim and that’s fucking horrible.

I just like being anal (heh heh).

You’re not being anal, you’re being wrong.

I guess the question is going to be if Taylor knew she’d been beaten and was being forced to have sex with him.

If you say so. :stuck_out_tongue:

The good people of Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont, Washington and West Virginia disagree with you.

The people of those states can all kiss my ass. It’s sleazy and unethical even when there’s consent, and in this case, there was no consent. She wasn’t a prostitute. She was a kidnapped child brought there to be raped against her will. I don’t see how you can call that “meh.”

It sounds like the police are saying Taylor didn’t beat the girl. And he was charged with solicitation and sexual assault, not battery or anything of that type.

More details:

Hey genius, you’re one of those people. It’s perfectly legal for you to bang a 16 year old neighbor should you have one and an interest in doing so.

I don’t and any 40 year old who does is a sleazeball. I don’t care what the law says.

You’re still missing the bigger point that this girl was not consenting, by the way.

No, being prostituted makes you a victim of rape. Try the phrase on for size, because it’s the only one that fits. A prostitute, whatever the merits of his/her choice to enter that line of work, earns some benefit from that work. This young girl earned no benefit whatsoever by being passed around to all the various and sundry perverted cohorts of this sleazebag parole violator.

If you’re referring to Lawrence Taylor, I just read that he’s actually in his 50’s!

Don’t know how many of you caught the arraignment of LT, but his lawyer seems a bit “out there”. Clearly, he wants to make a name for himself, but he looked and sounded like a complete jackass.

This looks pretty bad. Based solely on what I’ve heard so far, we have a $300 payment to a pimp (who was also arrested), a runaway 16 year old girl who was picked up by one of her parents, and LT getting busted.

His lawyer claims there was no sex, which means that LT paid $300 to sit and talk to the poor girl about life. It’s all a misunderstanding! The lawyer also said something that was eye opening. In arguing for a reduced bail, he said that the majority of these felony cases are plead down to misdemeanors. WTF kind of argument is that?

I think he’s screwed.

Really? LT, a 51 year old man, one of the greatest linebackers in history has to pay to have sex? And his woman of choice is an underage girl? This is just sad.

I’m betting he gets the maximum sentence.

Despite what I said earlier about Class E felonies, I saw ESPN reported that he could get up to four years. I don’t know if that’s because of his own record or the other circumstances surrounding this, or what.

A lot of richer and way more attractive not to mention currently popular celebrities pay for prostitutes. It is not the sex they are paying for. We also don’t know if the girl being underage was his choice, he might have just called for a hooker and they sent her that one.

One that he went ahead and did against her will, even after her pimp had already given her a black eye for saying no.

He isn’t being charged with forcible rape. He’s being charged with a class E felony. If the DA thought he forced her against her will it would be a much higher letter. I assume that would be a Class A felony, and would carry a higher maximum penalty than 4 years. His charges are soliciting a prostitute and statutory rape.

If he beat her and forced her, I’d want to see him do more time than a lousy 4 years.

From the way it was described in the link it looks like the lack of consent came before the girl was ever brought in to him. I’m just saying there is a difference between forcibly raping an underage girl and calling for a hooker and getting an underage girl who was beaten into prostitution.

I don’t care what he’s charged with. She wasn’t consenting, and he knew she wasn’t consenting because her pimp had already given her a black eye for saying no.

Yeah its not like call girls put on make up or anything. Once again you are jumping to conclusions, you have no idea what happened besides what you’ve made up in your messed up brain.

He knew she’d been punched in the face, and this wasn’t some kind of normal escort service. I don’t believe for a second that he didn’t know what he was paying for.

I see no difference whatsoever. It’s exactly the same thing.