Hi there. Before I begin, let me introduce myself…
My name’s Ian, alias Roland Orzabal. I’m a long-time lurker, first-time poster here at the SDMB. I love reading the comments and watching the debates, and many a time I’ve felt compelled to jump in, being as I tend to be of a fairly opinionated nature. So, you may ask, why haven’t I? (You may also ask what any of this has to do with the subject line, and rightly so, but bear with me…we’ll get to that in a moment). The reason is that I can’t seem to decide what specific topic would allow me to give an accurate “first impression”; you folks seem to know each other pretty well, and I don’t want to misrepresent myself by jumping into something with mouth a-blazin’ and alienating half the SDMB right off the bat.
As such, I’ve decided to kick things off with something a little more abstract (yes, finally, we come to the point)…the issue of Legality versus “Rightness”. I’ve noticed that in most of the forums, particularly Great Debates, when the legality of a particular topic comes into question, approximately half the posters will focus on the current legality of the issue in question, whereas the other half seems to discuss the “rightness” behind it. For the purposes of this discussion, I’m defining “rightness” as “the morality of a given action or situation, where the basis of said morality is a source other than governmental law”. Whether that source is external, such as a religious code, or internal, where intuition and emotion are used to determine morality, is entirely irrelevant (and don’t get me started…). Now then, back to the point.
Such debates almost always become excruciating exercises in confusion and misunderstanding, since the two “sides” are effectively arguing about two different topics. A good example, though I could cite many, would be this thread regarding freedom of speech in schools. So, I’d like to settle the score here and now: When discussing the legality of a given situation, is the purpose of the thread to determine whether the action in question is legal, or whether it should be legal?
Incidentally, I do indeed have a stance on this, but I believe I’ll hold my cards until at least a couple people respond. Oh, and don’t worry that I’m just waiting so that I can agree with the majority…I can assure you from a great deal of experience that that doesn’t happen too much
One final note…am I always this annoyingly self-analytical and verbose? Why, yes! But I’ll try to restrain myself in future posts, for the convenience (and sanity) of my fellow Dopers. Hello again, nice to meet you all, and let the discussion begin!