lekatt, is there any reason that CUs should not be used for commercial purposes? E.g. The Transformers, season 3, episode 16:
This is the forum for debate, not for people talking past each other, so your first point is irrelevant to this thread to this point.
Your second point is also irrelevant to this thread. I have never shut down any thread because I disagreed with the premise of one side or the other of any discussion. If this thread is locked, again, it will be because posters on one or both sides have chosen to ignore each other while edging closer and closer to badgering and insults. If you believe that I should leave open a thread simply so that I can have the “fun” of repeatedly having to read increasingly hostile posts when there is no actual discussion involved, you are simply wrong.
[ /Modding ]
If you think that certain posters are talking past each other, or are being hostile, then please speak with those posters. Do not close the thread in which posters are enquiring as to lekatt’s beliefs and the grounds for those beliefs.
I can’t say about the condition of Ms. Schiavo"s brain. I don’t believe anyone can know for sure. I quote from my site because that is where I have stored the material I present to the public. Not all of the material has been written by me, I would guess less than half are actually my writings.
I would guess the larger the number of CUs the more intelligent the consciousness, the more you learn and understand the more CUs. This is just an opinion. Whether some CUs are more desirable than others are unknown.
Funny by not practical, we will have to isolate the units first.
Is the sun more intelligent than the moon? (Bearing in mind that in some belief sytems the sun god is more powerful than the moon god.)
Does the sun have a greater level of consciousness than the moon?
Is there a difference between leval of intelligence and level of consciousness?
Isolate CUs from commercial use, or isolate CUs for commercial use?
When atoms are busted or smooshed together (e.g. fission or fusion), does it harm CUs?
Are there certain groupings of CUs that are good or bad?
Talking past each each other is the very definition of witnessing. Is this still the forum for witnessing?
That’s pretty bad advice. I frequently get bad guidance from sources inside myself, so i find the only way to improve my judgement and make better choices is to find sources outside of myself. In my experience, I have found that the scientific method is the best way to determine which sources are reliable. So far, no sources for religion and spirituality have cleared that bar.
In answer to all of your questions: I don’t know.
I personally have found that to be very good advice, so we disagree on this. As for the scientific method it lacks the ability to test personal experiences, but that doesn’t make personal experiences any less true or real.
So how do you distinguish between bad guidance and good guidance from within?
Show it.
By its peace and calm. Or by feelings, there is an overriding law that governs all spiritual activity, it is the law of love. If the advice fits it is ok, if not then don’t act on it. It is really very easy with a little practice.
I posted a link previously that shows a lot of the research where evidence is shown that consciousness and brain are two separate entities. You can find it in post #37.
I do not trust my feelings. In my experience, they have been the source of most of my problems in my life. Things that seem like a good idea at the time invariably turn out to be What The Hell Was I Thinking? moments. I would still be an alcoholic if I used your yardstick to guide my judgement; I love beer, so it must be good, right?
Saw your post. Did not see evidence. Explain what it was you expected I would see.
So you’re now admitting that everything you posted in the other threads about the poor woman is groundless and your accusations against her poor husband were slander?
Well, competent doctors can know for sure that when the brain’s deteriorated it’s deteriorated.
I seriously doubt that’s the reason. It seems to me that the reason you post links to that blog is that’s where you’ve conveniently added the stuff that fits your agenda.
So about half of it is your agenda-ridden posts? Wow, that’s quite a scientific powerhouse there! Anyway, the stuff that you didn’t write had to come from somewhere. Post a direct link to wherever it is you found it.