Someone said it about Trump, with actual evidence.
The Trump strategy concerning Clinton is ‘project like a motherfucking multiplex’.
Call me when they stupidly decide to rename said dressing in their cafeteria “freedom dressing”.
Bikini. Own the moment.
Or, the Blue Dress. What a “Fuck You” that would have been! Hell, I’da even thought about
Start here:
Another brief glimpse at the monster lurking inside:
A not-so-subtle threat of the personal and professional destruction of any woman who dares come forward with claims of sexual assault from her perverted husband.Dude, you supported Donald Trump, who possibly ran the most dishonest campaign in history. You don’t get to call others out as liars.
And like conservatives care about rape. I thought victims were asking for it because their bodies had ways of shutting it down if it wasn’t what they wanted?
Well, your current sock name is certainly appropriate, Derek.
Actually, this attitude is precisely the problem.
The reason why some of Trumps people may be in deep trouble with the law, AND why the Trump Presidency is struggling, is because they all felt entitled to decide for themselves, what the laws concerning international business dealings OUGHT TO BE, such that they should be allowed to ignore them all for the sake of personal profit.
It is yet another example both of why government regulation of business is necessary, as well as why anyone who proclaims that the government should be run as though it is a business, should be remanded to elementary school for another go round.
Please explain exactly what “laws concerning international business dealings” were violated in the case described in the OP.