Local TV station defends Dr. Laura's honor...

First of all, let me start by stating that I live in Vermont, first state in the union to legalize civil unions, which is right-wing speak for gay marriages. While I am proud of my supreme court for making this decision, it has apparently caused a counter-reaction, allowing every homophobic ass to proudly declare how much, while he has nothing against “those people” personally, and while it doesn’t matter what they do “behind closed doors,” the whole idea makes him sick. I cannot tell you how many times I’ve heard this speach from (ex)coworkers, politicians, and your average Joe who feels the need to discuss this with me in a coffee shop. So far, I have withheld from hitting anyone, but this morning, that almost changed.

I’m happily relishing the life of a lazy college student, waking up at 9 and watching Regis, when my local NBC (WPTZ) affiliate comes on with an “editorial.” Apparently, they’ve been getting flack for “Dr.” Laura’s upcoming television version of her hate-filled-unqualified-mental-health-advice show. The gist of the editorial went something like this:

We’ve been getting a lot of mail about Dr. Laura’s soon to be televised talk show. Apparently, some people feel her views toward homosexuality are wrong, and want us to cancel the show before they even see it. Well, we here at WPTZ just want to give equal time toward this issue. We air NBC’s hit comedy Will and Grace [shot of Jack leaping into Will’s arms. The word HOMOSEXUALITY is mock-stamped in rd ink over the image], a show centering around two gay men.

He then mentioned another show, as “Evidence” of how open minded thier station was, which for the life of me, I can’t remember. And thier website doesn’t have the editorial I am talking about listed yet. He ended his schpiel with “We’re just trying to give equal air time to this issue” or something along those lines. (the morons can’t even post an editoral after it airs?)

So, Dopers, because I know what avid Dr. Laura fans you all are, I ask your help in drafting a letter back to the station. Here is my start:

To whom it may concern:

I was dismayed and disappointed to view your editorial which aired August 30th, regarding “Dr.” Laura’s upcoming television show. While I understand your motives in writing and airing this editiorial were to give yourselves a proverbial pat on your backs for being so liberal in airing Will and Grace and other “gay-friendly” shows, the fact of the matter is that you as an NBC affiliate, you would be more then foolish to refuse to air a hit comedy because two of the characters are gay. I watch Will and Grace because it is a well written show with a solid cast, not because it promotes HOMOSEXUALITY, as you implied by superimposing the word in block-stamped font over the image of the show. I watch the show because it’s funny.

To imply that WPTZ is providing a service by airing Dr. Laura’s show, by giving equal airtime to the homosexuality issue is ridiculous. “Dr.” Laura is not a psychiatrist. Indeed, she has no psychiatric or psychological training at all. She is a judgmental shrew who takes a perverse joy in destroying the delicate egos of those callers who are fool enough to enter into her realm. As a psychology student, I am personally offended that she claims a title which I, God willing, will some day possess. She is NOT capible of giving psychological advice.

And then there is her stance on the homosexuality issue. People may have a problem with other people being gay. That’s fine. That’s they’re opinion, and they are welcome to it. But when someone who is claiming a title she has no right to claim sits in front of a mic and says with a degree of certanty that homosexuals are deviants and biological mistakes, that gives an air of crediance to that claim, as the average viewer/listener is not aware that she has no training or education to make such hateful claims. She is NOT making these statements as personal opionions, by claiming the title of Doctor, she is giving them professional crediance. It is this that I find so objectionable.

You may personally believe what you wish. And I have no doubt that you will air her show. I am well aware that there is no such thing as bad publicity. And I am sure that the first episode will get you and your sponsors ratings numbers. But don’t try to justify those ratings as “equal airtime” for the issue. Equal airtime would be to air a show hosted by a homosexual psychotherepist that would discuss the detrimental effects of repression of homosexual orientation. Air the show, collect your sponsor’s dollars. But don’t attempt to justify that as something that is noble.

And I will be staging a ban on any products or services aired as commercials during the Dr. Laura show. As a University of Vermont student, I plan to encourage other students to do the same, especially the local sponsors. And for the record, I am a heterosexual who finds hate mongering speech offensive in any form.

Jane Doe (I’m going to use my real name in the final letter)
Burington, VT

spelling and grammatical errors will be corrected when I type this up in Word. I have emailed them asking for a transcript and will post that here so you guys can write a letter if you find the editorial as offensive as I did. I support their right to have an editorial, and I champion my right to tell them that they’re editorial is full of bat guano. What say ye, Dopers? Suggestions?

Personally, for what it’s worth, I don’t think her show will last all that long.
Too bad MST3K was cancelled-can you see the FUN they would have with her?

Anyways, as much as I hate her, she DOES have a right to free speech. Although, I totally agree with the part about how she’s not a doctor. That pisses me off. Her doctorate is in PHYSIOLOGY! A glorified Phys Ed teacher!
And not only is her stance on homosexuality offensive, have you heard other things she condemns? I heard a group of Wiccans sued her for slander, or something like that.
And it IS stupid to compare her show to Will and Grace…I mean, that show is a fictional sitcom.
The woman is offensive on ALL levels, NOT just on homosexuality.

I applaud your letter. It is intelligent, well-written, and has a down-to-earth argument that is hard to discount. I also happen to agree with you.

I admire your standing up for your convictions and voicing an opinion.

Not sure how you should word this, but technically, she IS allowed to refer to herself as “Dr.” as a prior poster noted that she has a Doctorate. Although to refer to herself as “Dr” and then dispense advice about psychology and morality, does seem misleading.
PS (not a Dr. Laura fan, but don’t want them to have an easy out on the issue)

What’s really sad is that despite the many levels of quackery and bafoonery this woman practices, she still has avid listeners and followers. If not for these sad, sad individuals who faun at her every word, this woman would dissolve into non existance in a wink of an eye. I think I am more inclined to dispise her fans and caller than I am driven to condemn her. It takes a small mind to do what she does, it takes a smaller mind to embrace it.

As an aside, I’ve always wanted to live in Vermont. Years ago, in our late teens and early twenties, my friends and I used to make monthly trips to VT from Montreal for hiking and cycling. In the winter they were more like weekly trips to Jay Peak, Stowe and Smuggler’s Notch for skiing.

If it was me, the letter would’ve said “In the past, you’ve editorialized about/decried the increasing teen pregnancy rate, crime rate, and use of crack cocaine. Could you please give equal air-time to the opposite viewpoint?”

i am not a fan of dr laura, i find her rather abrasive. perhaps if she would follow the “if you can’t say anything nice don’t say anything at all” rule. following that rule i will not listen to her on the radio or watch her on tv. i will not buy her books, or any of the products she endorses.
so swimming riddles if you could help out with telling me what products to boycott in the interest of having her “say nothing at all”, i will boycott, even if it is (very stiff lip here) ben and jerry’s ice cream (major sac.).

i will not listen to her in a boat, i will not listen to her while afloat. i will not listen to her, swimming riddle, i will not watch her, really i won’t.

Swimster,

Good letter! I find that shrew very offensive, even though I too am heterosexual. Her radio show is on just before the 4:00 show I do like to listen to. So if I’m going home early, I’m assaulted with her voice.

(It’s amazing what losers call her show. I can tell from the get-go that she’s going to lambaste them. Do these people actually think she’s going to take their side of their family issue?)

It is ironic that you’ll have to watch her show to find out which sponsors not to do business with. Maybe just record it and just zoom through to the commercials.

Best of Luck,
AWB

Swiddles, you have impressed me yet again with your ability to express your thoughts in writing.

I listened to her radio show once, as I will not form an opinion of anything or anyone I have not experienced myself. That woman is a menace, in my opinion.

Guinastasia, you are mistaking physiology for kinesiology. Physiology is an extremely demanding and rigourous discipline. Any medical doctor will be well-versed in human physiology, as it deals with cellular and chemical reactions within the body. In fact, physiology helps explain the mechanisms behind everything your body is capable of.

Kinesiology deals more with the movement the human body. Studies in exercise, joints, etc… Sure, physiology plays a part as the driving factor, but the kinesiologist does not have to be as well versed in the intracacies as does a physiologist.

I don’t know Dr. Laura’s sub-discipline; but as someone who has taken (and taught) several anatomy/physiology classes, I know she would have had to apply herself with great diligence for this discipline. Ask any med student how easy A&P or neuro-phys is.

You may now resume the rant at hand.

good letter swiddles! I can’t see how they can think putting a comedy longside an “alleged” serious talk/advice show is equal airtime (especially when there are probably tens or more of sitcoms about non-gay couples being aired by them…more than balances it out anyway).
My godfather has a phD in chemistry & he is entitled to call himself Dr.<name>, so change the doctor it to say that it implies she is a medical doctor…like the others said.

http://www.stopdrlaura.com has information on who her advertisers are, so it isn’t necessary to watch (or tape) her show in order to find out which companies to boycott.

How often does Dr. Laura talk about homosexuality on her radio program?

(I hear her infrequently at best, so I don’t know.)

Is she as single-minded about the subject as Father Coughlin was about the Jews? (That is, does she talk about the subject very frequently, at length…or has she said her bit only once in a blue moon?)

Given that she probably fields hundreds of calls per show and can pick and choose what she can talk about…if she keeps coming back to the subject of homosexuality again and again, you could make a stronger case that she is obsessed by the subject. CBS pulled Coughlin not only because of what he said but because he said it again, and again, and again.

I always wonder why they quit using the ‘hook?’

So, Swiddles, my head sometimes being thicker than…well, thick things, is your local affiliate really WPTZ? That would be just too much of a Wallyincidence…

Thanks for the link, dogsbody. I was just on my way out the door to Albertsons; good thing the Safeway is closer anyway. :wink: Anyone know if there’s a site like this for Rush?

Sorry for the slight hijack, but I have another question regarding how companies spend their money. I frequently hear things like “Oh don’t buy from such and such because they give money to so and so.” Is there a way to find out where a businesses money goes? So often when I hear stuff like that I wonder if it’s just rumor, like the P&G nonsense from several years ago.

For the record, I am a dyed-in-the-wool religious conservative who finds most of Dr. Laura’s views unobjectionable. But even with that background I find her radio show deeply offensive. Has this woman ever said anything nice to anyone in her entire life?

I’ve listened to her show a few times. A typical caller starts explaining his/her problem and Dr. Laura jumps in about halfway through and starts hammering the caller about something they said in their explanation:

Caller: “I was so mad I just walked out of the room, and I …”

Dr. Laura: “You WALKED OUT OF THE ROOM? How can you turn your back on your mother who gave you life and raised you? How can you possibly justify this?”, etc., etc.

She can’t wait to pick some nit. She doesn’t care whose behavior she criticizes as long as she gets to criticize. And if the caller survives long enough to actually get her “moral dilemma” answered, it’s usually some unthinking knee-jerk response to some keyword the caller used.

It is excruciatingly embarassing for me, as a religious conservative, to have this women held up as a spokesperson for religion OR conservatism. She does not exemplify the principles she claims to espouse.

I continue to be astonished and more than a little concerned about her popular support. How could she possibly be popular enough to even consider having a television show? – Who is listening to her? Who are these people?

[/quote]
How often does Dr. Laura talk about homosexuality on her radio program?[\quote]

I guess that someone who actually listens to her show regularly should answer that question. (Yes, I am one of THOSE people.) Dr. Laura talks about homosexuality on her show very little. She is on the air for three hours a day five days a week. I have listened for weeks and not even heard a passing mention of homosexuality. Usually when I do hear her mention it she is commenting on a news article.

I have noticed that most of the people who jump on the “I hate Dr. Laura” band wagon have never listened to her show for more then five minutes. They base many of their opinions on statements taken out of context and “direct quotes” that are really misquotes. I see Dr. Laura misquoted more often then I see her correctly quoted.

No offense Pluto, but your description of a typical call was way off the mark.

The bold parts are the words that were stamped over images of the shows in question. Remarkable Journey promoted a liberal agenda? Huh?

FWIW, I had to listen to Dr. Laura for a thankfully short period of time, due to a coworker who listened to talk radio all day. I found her increadibly offensive, and potentially very emotionally damaging to the people who were already emotionally fragile enough to call her. And I DID listen for more than 5 minutes. I had to.

I think I’m going to amend my letter to talk about the secret agenda insiuation. Are they attempting to make fun of the claim that homosexuals have a secret agenda? I take that claim very seriously, and find it very offensive, not something to make fun of. Or something.

Ooops, my bad!
I guess I READ that somewhere…feel free to slap me.

What cracks me up is that I saw her on tv just a week ago, going on and on about something or other. And she gave examples of calls from her show. The kicker? The people who called really needed help-a girl whose mother was forcing her daughter to go to her mom’s boyfriend’s house, and the girl couldn’t get her homework done. Dr. Laura told the girl to go to Gramma’s after school.
And then there was the boy who was fourteen, his gf wanted sex, he wasn’t ready. His dad wouldn’t give him advice-all dad said was-it’s your choice.

That said, I’ve READ her interviews. And the woman is a psychoharpy. Comments like slut, can’t keep your legs closed to young GIRLS…um…okay.
Plus, she pimps her son for all it’s worth.

It would serve her fucking right if little Derek was gay and married a Wiccan Priest.