It totally slipped my mind. I checked around at work today and got a lot of responses like “Oh yeah, I heard all the hubbub about that show but I forgot to tune in, etc.” I can’t find anybody within arm’s reach who actually saw it.
Let’s hear all about it. And please- all of the debating about what is moral or ethical is going on in other threads so let’s just skip that here. What did you really think about the show?
Sorry to say that I didn’t see it. Y’know why? Cause “Dr.” Laura is a stupid fuck head. She actually gay-bashed on national television, or even television for that matter. Thats just wrong. I have a few gay friends and they were, ofcourse, just as pissed off. She claims its because shes a very religious Jew. Great excuse… whore.
I saw a little bit of it today (Wednesday - 13), opus. She was ‘debating’ with an elderly woman who was for daycare, and Dr. Laura was speaking from the opposite view. They then had an economist show a number of people in the audience that they were losing money with the wife working. Actually, the part that I saw was pretty boring.
I won’t read her column, if I hear her voice on the radio I change the station before she has uttered her second syllable… why would I watch the woman that Lola calls “that bitch” on television?
Does anyone actually like this narrow minded, anally retentive, piece of work?
Methinks that any threads with that bitches name in the title should be automatically sent to the Pit…
Driving accross country last year in my wife’s Honda. No CD player - no tape deck. Except for a few pockets of civilization, from Wyoming to California, the only thing I could get on the radio was this dip-shit’s show. I wanted to drive off a mountain just to end my suffering.
Of course I could have, but then I would have had to rely on the voices in my head for entertainment. I don’t think society at large really wants me to do that.
So how do you lose money if both spouses are working? Does it have something to do with the insurance or something? Or is he strictly speaking from the daycare costs point of view?
I watched some of it today, out of pure morbid curiosity (like when you slow down to look at a car wreck). She’s incredibly annoying. There’s something else disturbing about her, but I can’t quite explain it…
I’m afraid I can’t help you with the answer, ** beakerxf, ** I saw the discussion, and that was pretty much it. My guess is, with the cost of maintence for a second car, gas, daycare costs, clothing, extra taxes, and insurance most families go in the hole without realizing it. This is based on a NBC Dateline that I watched last year, it sounded somewhat the same yesterday.
The show comes on at one here in Atlanta, and I came on it accidentally while my son was doing his Mavis Beacon typing test (We home school). I was curious if Dr. S. would be as short and coarse with people face to face, I kind of doubted it, but I didn’t get a chance to see if my guess was correct.
I have seen any number of these cost analyses, and they are usually skewed to “prove” that women should stay home. If a family had to purchase a second car and all sorts of fancy clothes so the wife could work at a low-wage job in a far away department store, maybe the equation would hold. Just the fact that “cost of maintenance of a second car” is included should show that these figures are really skewed. I guess it is pretty rare for a suburban family with a stay-at-home mom to have only one car.
Perhaps her “withered husk that once contained a soul” complexion?
What I find fascinating is that people with problems actually respect the opinion of someone who will gratuitously abuse and insult them. Arguably her sins are qualitatively no different from those of a psychiatrist who sleeps with patients; in both cases someone is playing on the weaknesses of another in order to exploit them.