Looks like no Golden Globes or Oscars this year

A good article on the WGA/DGA negotiations (though the long-term pros & cons aren’t completely resolved yet):

Most employees in the entertainment business are unionized. If one group goes on strike, the others understand.

That’s called “solidarity.”

I see no basis for you to declare what others do or do not “understand,” nor is there any indication as to what you yourself mean by “understanding.” I’m sure the directors “understood” the WGA’s position; that didn’t stop them from striking their own deal. So much for “solidarity” between unions.

But I thought you were worried about “the little people” who are out of work…

You quote my post, but this is not responsive to it. If you would clarify the point you’re trying to make, I’d be happy to try to respond.

Justin_Bailey writes:

> If all unions disappeared tomorrow, I’d be a happy camper.

So you’re against unions. It would have helped if you had just said this at the beginning. Perhaps you should start another thread called “All Unions Stink” or whatever.

Huzzah! There might actually be an Academy Awards this year! Keep your fingers crossed. I didn’t want to start a new thread unless and until the strike is officially over, but things are looking up.

Strike: An end in sight?

fingers crossed

In my perfect world the settlement would come just slightly too late for the Academy Awards. The fewer gaudy, self-congratulatory circle-jerk awards programs, the better.

:rolleyes: