[QUOTE=peekercpa]
Everything went fine. I certainly won’t go into details and pollute this thread any more than I already have. I’ll probably start a MPSIMS thread when things calm down.
What little I was able to re-read before my Blackberry ran out of juice leads me back to my first choice.
In trying to look at the whole motivation thing Queen of Town’s “snuggle” did sure read like trying to build some cred if I get lynch and when I turn up town.
I want to at least make sure I have a vote on record so therefore,
Vote Queen of Town
I’ll have limited access the rest of the day doing the discharge thing and getting the kid home and comfortable.
[/QUOTE]
So, I had suspicions yesterday about peekercpa because of the amount of accusations, vote changes, and the way they were presented (basically “smudging” many different people), and so I voted for him. And as it turned out from the above post, peekercpa’s final vote was for Queen of Town, which was a townie of course. To me thats extra evidence, as scum would want to try to start a bandwagon against townies. Of course it didn’t happen this time, and it turned out that QoT was night killed.
So, I think once again, peekercpa is the most suspicious one out there to me.
Vote peekercpa
As for the other voting and discussion going on, I think asking for a modkill isn’t evidence of anything it particular. Its not really helpful as sach will decide where the criteria are for substantive, and the debate over that term was a pretty wasteful way for people to pass the time/posts. On the other hand, of course it would be nice to down two scum at once, but thats very optimistic, there’s no guarantee that non-substantive posting would get only scum.
And as I said above, I think this is bogus. Two lynches isn’t any help if we have no idea whether the modkilled people are scum. Its a deceptive tactic to frame it that way. fluiddruid is trying to imply that two lynches is two scum kills without saying it.
FOS fluiddruid