Stump question: I don’t have any problem with your vote but could you explain a little more why trying to figure out who QOT was protecting is deserving of a vote?
Just curious. Oh, also to stimulate any type of discussion.
Because trying to figure out who QOT was protecting is not anything we should be doing. Who do you think QOT was protecting? The cop. And who will benefit from this? The scum. That’s obvious, isn’t it?
Frankly, I’m not going down this road any longer.
my vote on pedesribe stands. And peeker his a huge-ass fos.
Okie Dokie. Like I said previously, I just would like to have a little more traffic.
You have provided your reason(s) and I respect that.
Queen of Town is new, is it conceivable that she didn’t know the rules and was too late to cast her vote to protect anyone? But I agree, as Doctor the smart play day one is to protect yourself, she didn’t, trying to figure out who she protected (if anyone) is an investigative dead end. She had as much information to act on as everyone else here.
Well, I don’t think a newbie would have picked up on that. At least, I sure didn’t. So it seems likely to me that the Mafia have at least one experienced player among them. Therefore, at least one of the experienced players in this game is probably scum.
I am also against discussion of who the Doctor was protecting, but I don’t know if I would go as far as voting for pedescribe just for broaching the topic.
WF wanting to distract suspicion from the newbies raises some concerns.
Could it be all the scum are “newbies”?
I doubt it, since I think fluiddruid is scum,but if I am wrong about fluiddruid then the scum may all be “newbies”.
Do you intend to address my FoS on you and my contention that you have perhaps deliberately misinterpreted FD’s statements? I’d really like to hear from you on this so that I can decide whether or not I would like to turn my FoS into a full-fledged vote.
Actually, I disagree with this. Since, as Sitnam said, she had no more information than the rest of us, it is unlikely that a)she found the cop, and b)she was worried about him/her enough to not self-protect.
Personally, I think that there are two possibilities. One, she protected the most-in-danger person that wasn’t lynched. Since the votes were pretty much evenly spread, this is highly unlikely.
Or, two, she didn’t know/couldn’t self-protect. This, I see as more likely, since this is probably a bog-standard game, so the reason for going closed would be for rules quirks like this. It means we know a little more about Sach’s modding style.
And that’s all I’m going to say on it, since it’s apparently not kosher.
I’m removing the FOS on W F Tomba because of this. It doesn’t seem like something a newbie scum would say.
As for fluiddruid…I haven’t seen much out of the ordinary with her. I’ll have to keep an eye out, but I’m not suspicious yet.
I am suspicious of Blaster Master. I know that he usually has a lot of in-depth strategy posts, but this time it seems like he’s yanking us around on a chain. The “skum would do this” post just seemed a little too strongly worded for it to be honest townie speculation. I’m not too sure though…
It’s getting dangerous to be gung-ho, so I’m not voting for now.
I’m not sure where to start here, MadTheSwine.
First of all - why is calling for a modkill of a known lurker scummy? As I said at the time (and you failed to quote or reference), killing someone who was already a high vote target is essentially two lynches for town. Now, check me if my math doesn’t work out, but this is like a night kill failing - a free lynch with scum not able to fight back. How exactly is this scummy? It’s the opposite - it’s clearly pro-town and I find it very peculiar that you’ve tried to state otherwise with no basis.
Secondly, frankly, the number of scum in play has little to nothing to do with the discussion of the Town at this point (considering it’s Day Two, we have no real leads, and no role claims). That combined with the fact that you’ve ham-handedly asked the Town “should we ask the Detective to step forward”? What, wasn’t losing the Doctor already enough?
I’m sure some may see this as an OMGUS vote, but frankly I don’t care, this is the scummiest post I’ve seen all game.
vote MadTheSwine
Hey everyone - sorry not to have posted yet toDay. I’ve been closing and striking a show, so I’ve just been flat out all weekend. I will be back in full swing tomorrow.
All I will say for now is the obvious: losing the Doctor on night 1 is teh suxx0r. :mad:
It would be a good idea for the Detective to say so if and only if we’re on the point of lynching him or her. Now that we’ve lost the Doctor, we can’t protect an outed power role. I want the Detective, if there is one, to have a chance of investigating more than one person.
MadTheSwine has played this game enough to know what a dangerous suggestion he just put forth.
Vote MadTheSwine
I just to go with my gut. During the night the scum could have taken out a more experienced player. I know that this is a WIFOM proposition but …
If I take n (the number of players) and multiply that by the probability that someome is scum (x). If you take that number and take the square root of the circumfrence of my asshole truth will be obtained.
Blaster Master can, of course put this in a more formal notation.
So, I had suspicions yesterday about peekercpa because of the amount of accusations, vote changes, and the way they were presented (basically “smudging” many different people), and so I voted for him. And as it turned out from the above post, peekercpa’s final vote was for Queen of Town, which was a townie of course. To me thats extra evidence, as scum would want to try to start a bandwagon against townies. Of course it didn’t happen this time, and it turned out that QoT was night killed.
So, I think once again, peekercpa is the most suspicious one out there to me.
Vote peekercpa
As for the other voting and discussion going on, I think asking for a modkill isn’t evidence of anything it particular. Its not really helpful as sach will decide where the criteria are for substantive, and the debate over that term was a pretty wasteful way for people to pass the time/posts. On the other hand, of course it would be nice to down two scum at once, but thats very optimistic, there’s no guarantee that non-substantive posting would get only scum.
And as I said above, I think this is bogus. Two lynches isn’t any help if we have no idea whether the modkilled people are scum. Its a deceptive tactic to frame it that way. fluiddruid is trying to imply that two lynches is two scum kills without saying it.
FOS fluiddruid
I agree. Having the detective reveal himself now that the doctor is gone is exactly what we DON’T want. I could possibly agree with them revealing themselves now if they had some potential for protection but a scum killed now for the detective the next night doesn’t seem like a fair trade to me.
Unvote pedescribe
Vote MadTheSwine
Hey, Mind Wanderer, there has been only one lynch not two. #4Z4.
Whoa, back up. If we lynch a scum, the total number goes down, making it 8-3. And if we lose the decective in the process (and without a doctor, we probably will), that makes it 7-3. So, if the detective role-claims today, that will be 8-4 today to 7-3 tommorow. Not a spectacular leap. Was he trying to give false numbers or was this an accident? I think, without the doctor, that every remaining power role should be twice as wary (unless there are scum power roles, they should feel free to slip up :)), and, as mentioned earlier, MTS knows that.
So I’m happy to hop on the bandwagon (with the 4th vote) and
Vote MadTheSwine
but, as usual, this may change pending further parinoia, badly worded posts, and frightned, 11th hour defenses.
Heh, it sounds like MadTheSwine was safer in the shadows.
I’d like a (real) day or two for everyone to check in before voting, Sunday evening seems a little early for a bandwagon lynch going into Thursday. Votes ARE cheap, but I’ve never read Sherlock Holmes solving a case by bending to social proof.
What does this mean. Note that the post before it was
, in other words, completly unrelated, and after was
After that, zuma posted twice, then peekercpa posted once, then zuma posted twice again. And he hasn’t posted since (although that might not mean too much).
But that first one:
I can’t possibly decipher it…it’s only day two, so it’s not like town is desperate, and why would zuma need to save us? Unless…unless this is the legendary “accedentally posted to the wrong board” scum slip!
I…I’m really confuzulled. I…I can’t figure out what else it could possibly mean. Could someone please explain this? Untill then, I’m switching my vote.
Unvote MadTheSwine
Vote zuma
I thought that scum can only talk at night. Is that one of the uncertain rules?
Still weird though. I’d also like an explanation.