If he kills the Jester, we’re golden. Jester must be lynched, not night killed.
I can ask pretty much anything, as far as I know. The report the next morning will include the identity of the person I ask, my question, and their response.
Work is getting to me! I realized that -right- before I posted that, and yet I still went ahead and typed it up anyway. Booze, can I have some of those :smack:s back?
So the mod will PM their question, and they’ll PM their response back to the mod?
Total is making a lot of wierd statements that unless some one counterclaims him I have to assume is coming from a townie prospective. But I still want to argue them. The first is that claiming who was protected is a bad idea. The more information that we can present the town with more information to decided between us. This information does not give the scum any more information because they already know who’s scum and why would who was protected last Night matter to them, its not like it won’t influence who will be protected next. This is taking a while and I dont want to lose it so more later.
afaik.
A little bit more of my PIS you know its a bad idea when the scum are agreeing with it and NAF jumped all over this plan. Please dont lynch one of us let the vig do it.
The more I think about it why not have the doc and one of us special docs protect the vig that way even if the town selects the wrong one of us the vig still won’t kill himself. Well, I’m out of ideas for no I guess I’ll just wait for some responses.
Well it has been a weird day, and I think scum are playing a very weird game which is making me doubt what on first pass would be seen as town moves.
Not sure why we would wait for a lynch, we know that either Orediggr or NAF is scum. Why not just string em up, and then if we get it wrong, we do the other, one scum down.
Anyway back to this further slight by story on me in post 694 which I find a little odd.
Let’s look at the sequence of events because I think you are mixing them up.
Post 651 you provide one possibility for Total Lost holding up the mass claim moving forwards which is, they were scum
Also note in post 640 you said
Post 657 I say
Which is a quite reasonable reading of your post 651 and 640
You jumped back in post 660 and claimed I was the first one to make the connection. However it is pretty clear you think there may be a connection from post 651 and 640.
You then clarify what your post 641 actually meant, and repeated the accusation that I had preemptively pulled the connection out of my butt. Note you also have swapped from my comments from being about a discussion of the role claim to being about going along with the mass role claim.
When I defended my position in post 667 you jump back and say that you have already clarified what 651 intended. However I am just pointing out my reasoning for the original post and at the time I did not have the benefit of your later clarification.
It should be noted again you say this
Again you swap my concerns over discussion being seen a scummy for an actual refusal as being scummy.
Ok we may not be communicating effectively, the cause is more likely to be me than you though because I am mystified by your attacks on me.
Oh and please quit with the I am attacking you lines. I was posting my concerns over the speed of the mass role claim and potential false accusations against people who talked for longer, and you come up with this
I have not falsely accused you of anything. It would be impossible for me to falsely accuse you of anything, because I have not actually accused (or smudged or whatever it is you want to read into my posts) you of anything. This is just in your mind, I have no idea why I have pinged you scumdar so heavily. If you had not pushed this mass role claim id bethinking the only reason you are latching so heavily onto anything I say is because you are scum and know I am not and thus are pushing a lynch of me. This however does not make sense in light of your push for the mass role claim. To be honest I though peeky was scum as well and he is now a confirmed town, so my scumdar is just way out of whack.
Anyway this is all just a long post to say I think we should string up oredigger, naf and Story in some order.
Since its been suggested again I just want to be clear that I think its a horrible idea to lynch NAF. Something that everyone should worry about is that if the jester is lynched he will probably recruit the other person.
If they do this…I’ve got a plan…an eeeeeeevil plan. 
Edit: Seriously, do this and you will regret it.
Hey wait a minute. That’s my title.
And even though I brought this whole Mod Kill shit up in Sach’s game and even though he said he was all right with it because it was within the rules I still, post suggestion, felt like shit. I think Sach was just being gracious. Needless to say, I will not support or participate in a mass non Mod vote mass suicide. No Masadas.
Having said that I am also not going to reveal my specific role, for now.
I thought you were being annoying during the night. Refusing to reveal your role at this point… well, what can I say? Good play if you’re the Jester
Vote: 1. Peekerpa
But if he’s the Jester we DON’T want to lynch him (yet).
<Color Snipped>
C’mon Squiddy give a guy a break. I was catching up and made a post. Now a couple of pages later I see that more specificity has come out of the woodwork.
I’ve got the taser (roll block).
Sheesh if it weren’t perceived to be OMGYS you’d have a big 'ol blue numer one by your name.
I mean fishing in a lake without a clue is one thing (blind pigs find acorns and all that). But fishing in your toilet and hoping to get someone excited about your lump fish catch is really stretching.
And I ain’t buying that shit.
Noper. Especially since I am the tase equipped role blocker. If you gals/want to lynch the town’s role blocker then, Meh.
Not real sure what I am doing anyways so, whatever.
And now since I have fully claimed, Mr. Scum of some Pursuation, I assume you will either retract your vote or come up with a similarily lame reason to leave it in place.
Ceviche is a dish best served cold - if you get my drift at all.
I’d gladly join this list.
However, the politician hasn’t told me for whom to vote (and it has to be via the mod). So he can, actually, get me modkilled.
That doesn’t seem very fair?
It isn’t. However, let’s clarify:
Can the politician get his “victim” modkilled by not giving him a list of votes?
Well, we are going to be taking some sort of a stab today. We might hit Jester, but I don’t see the ambiguous power role as the sort of claim that a Jester is likely to make.
I’m not scum, peeks. I’m a very confirmable pro-Town role. Don’t get your panties in a bunch. On the other hand, I’m totally down with ceviche served cold.
Unvote: [del]dipshit[/del]peekerpa
Unless they were -trying- to get lynched.