I started to take notes about Day 2, but I’m going through a rather difficult time right now, so it’s been hard for me to devote as much time as I’d like to this game. But for what it’s worth, here are the two pages I bothered to summarize:
Day 2
bufftabby: wonders who to hang for OAOW’s death.
NAF: points out either Vig killed or there was no recruitment. Asks BlaM to expand on thoughts concerning “no lynch.”
Hawkeyeop: guesses Vig did the kill so revenge is unnecessary; thinks it unlikely mafia wouldn’t recruit.
CapnPitt(townie): fluff; reiterates the need for a lynch toDay.
Menocchio(claimed Doctor): agrees with Hawk that Vig did the killing; says that Vig is both liability and asset; expresses suspicion towards “more bloodthirsty members” regarding Day One no-lynch.
bufftabby: agrees with Hawk about Vig kill; states there must be a lynch toDay.
NAF: replies to Menocchio’s suspicions regarding “bloodthirsty members” by questioning why the Boss would stick their neck out by backing an unpopular opinion (i.e., a lynch); suggests a search for changes in style that would signal a switch in alignment; states that fluff is preferable to lurking in this game.
hotflungwok (townie): suggests a Vig kill because scum would want to double their numbers
Santo: replies to Menocchio’s suspicions about “bloodthirsty members” by pointing out that “wrong, bad, or different” does not equal scummy; also reiterates that the sole scum of Day 1 would not have risked being in “the smaller, more vicious group.”
Freudian: questions why a Vig would kill on Night One, given the odds of hitting a townie.
Santo: fluff questioning CapnPitt’s fluff.
bufftabby: fluff
OneCentStamp: reiterates need to lynch because a no-lynch “plays into the hands of the mafia” and that after a few lynches “maybe the picture will be a little more clear.”
Santo: agrees with OCS; asks whom to start with.
OCS: fluff about Shirley Jackson
hotflungwok (townie): replies to Freudian’s question of why a Vig would kill on Night One - because “it’s what we got” and also they probably were "not happy with the “No Lynch” vote.
Freudian: replies to Santo’s question of who to lynch with fluff.
Koldnar (claimed Vig): doubts a Vig kill; suggests the Boss wanted to confuse town.
bufftabby: suggests looking at “the lurky ones.”
<page 7>
Freudian: waffles on the issue of lynching, saying a no-lynch gives the Boss a bigger pool but that it seems silly to kill townies simply to give the Boss a smaller pool to choose from; questions whether the lynchee should be chosen at random.
Millit: thinks toDay we should 1) find out why the Vig would want OAOW dead, 2) find out why the Boss would want OAOW dead, 3) have the lurkers and the bloodthirsty explain themselves, because she’s “not ready to start busting heads yet” and she’s “not sure that’s where we should be looking.”
Hawkeyeop: replies to Koldnar’s doubts about the Vig kill by saying the Vig simply “took his best shot at finding a scum” and that we should do the same.
CapnPitt (townie): suggests Boss killed in case the town no-lynches again; agrees with a lynch toDay but doesn’t know who.
sinjin (claimed Mason): suggests that Boss might have killed since recruitment with so little knowledge would be a gamble and to lessen the risk of being outed as well as to “mess with town minds”; points out the town has just as little information to go on toDay as they did yesterDay.
HazelNutCoffee: replies to Millit’s wanting to know why the Boss might have killed OAOW by saying the “why” isn’t really helpful at this point; reiterates that Boss might have killed simply to confuse the town.
Pleonast (claimed Priest): notes that either the Boss or the Vig are playing “suboptimal”; strongly advocates lynch but admits scarcity of clues; notes that Hal’s comment on Day One about ending Night One early is a “townie tell”; questions the usefulness of asking BlaM to rehash no-lynch reasoning. [NOTE: infamous use of “she” to refer to the Boss post]
NAF: replies to sinjin’s points about a scum kill by saying it’s safer to assume a recruit unless there is evidence otherwise; supports lynching lurkers if “all other things [are] equal”; wants to know why people are going after the “bloodthirsty”; responds to Pleo by saying he wants to know what BlaM was thinking regarding a no-lynch since BlaM didn’t post yesterDay.
Menocchio (claimed Doctor): summarizes OAOW’s posts and surmises that he was killed by the Vig, either randomly or because he seemed slightly scummy.
Santo: replies to Freudian’s fluff with fluff.
Hawkeyeop: replies to NAF’s assertion concerning a lynch toDay by pointing out that the majority of town haven’t even expressed an opinion yet.
chrisk (Priest): has a “gut feeling” about a recruitment; says sorry about premmature ending yesterDay.
Hawkeyeop: replies to Pleo’s criticism of the potential Vig kill by saying “there is no benefit to waiting around.”
NAF: replies to Hawk’s remark that the town may not want to lynch by saying it’s “fucking stupid” to not lynch because “it gets us nowhere.”
Hawkeyeop: agrees with NAF but repeats that everyone should have their say.
NAF: apologizes to Hawk for being harsh
Koldnar (claimed Vig): says if the Boss recruited yesterDay, we now have a Hitman, which would equal three kills; points out Pleo’s use of “she.”
OAOW: undead fluff
Hawkeyeop: replies to Koldnar by pointing out the Hitman is not an extra kill but an assured kill.
OCS: fluff
Koldnar (claimed Vig): acknowledges misremembering.
Pleonast (claimed Priest): replies to Hawk’s defense of the Vig by saying it was a stupid gamble; replies to Koldnar’s note of pronoun use by saying it’s “equal opportunity” suspicion.
Freudian: replies to Santo’s fluff with fluff.
Hawkeyeop: replies to Pleo - “I agree with your equation; I just disagree with your conclusion.”
HNC: states that she would have been happy with a lynch yesterDay because of the discussion that would have been generated might have been helpful later on; points out that the odds of lynching a townie have not gone down significantly; remarks that arguing over what the Vig should/shouldn’t do is pointless.
Hal: replies to OCS’s fluff with fluff.
Freudian: decides a lynch would best after all; suggests a randomization method to pick a “lamb.”
dotchan (townie): FOS for Millit (speculating on reason for deaths = scum tell, “I’m not ready to start busting heads yet” is “fishy), Menocchio (analysis of dead players as possible scum tell), and Pleo (“townie tell” is suspicious”); observes that Vig should think carefully before killing.
bufftabby: replies to Freudian’s randomization suggestion with “a grain of salt.”
OCS: replies to Hal’s fluff with fluff.
Santo: asks for original player list pre-OAOW’s death; puts out a theory that an “inexperienced scum” might have killed the person above them on the original list in case OAOW was a Beat Cop.
Hawekeyeop: asks why the scum wouldn’t just recruit a Beat Cop rather than kill them.
Pleonast (claimed Priest): replies to dotchan by saying the “why” of a death is important because it pertains to recruitment; points out that scum doing townie analysis could be helpful anyway; says he simply doesn’t think Hal is the boss; remarks that “it’s a fine line” between speculating on why someone was killed and speculating on the actions of the Vig
NAF: responds to Freudian’s idea of random voting by saying it’s “a good way for town to lose.”
Darth Sensitive: responds to Freudian’s idea of random voting by saying it’s not pro-town.
Koldnar (claimed Vig): agrees with NAF that random voting is bad because it reveals nothing.
Pleonast (claimed Priest): points out that town will have many mislynches anyway and that random voting takes away responsibility.
fluidruid: informs Santo that OAOW was between dotchan and Idle Thoughts.
Hal (claimed Priest): replies to Hawk’s question “Why wouldn’t they just recruit?” with the suggestion that the scum was inexperienced.
NAF: bluntly says that a scum kill was stupid.
Menocchio (claimed Dcotor): replies to Santo’s theory by saying the kill was probably random or based on a “gut reaction”; notes that no one seems suspicious at this point.
Diomedes: replies to Menocchio’s suspicions about the bloodthirsty by saying no lynch = no accountability. Votes Menocchio.
Hockey Monkey: Votes Pleonast based on pronoun slip.
NAF: prods Menocchio for even weak reasoning and more sharing of thoughts; asks Dio why he voted for Menocchio.
Blaster Master: says he supported lynching on Day One because it would have generated discussion, and that the odds aren’t much better toDay anyway, but that he doesn’t particularly suspect anyone of being scum based on a no-lynch vote.
======
Summary of personal observations to follow.